ENCANA applies for Haynesville Units in S. Bossier
Encana has applied to the COC for 5 Haynesville Zone, Reservoir A Units in the Elm Grove Field. The Sections are 29, 30, 31 and 32, Township 17 North, Range 12 West and Section 36, 17 N, 13W. They also applied for Lower Cotton Valley Formation, Reservoir A Units in the same sections.
Views: 110
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on
-
SoBoRes,
I'm not in any of the proposed units either. I will check the Clerk's records and see if a lease is recorded for the large landowner in your section. I have heard they leased and I have heard they haven't.
-
Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on
-
SoBoRes,
I just checked and no lease is on file for that person. I think it would be polite to delete you comment with their name in it. I think they deserve their privacy. Just like the rest of us, they have to decide what to do with their property based on what they feel is best for their family.
-
Permalink Reply by Bill on
-
Well I guess my lease wont expire before they pop a well in sec 21...lol..Oh well, maybe some decent royalties in the future.
-
Permalink Reply by The_Baron on -
It's possible the minerals are not owned by the surface owner. Or the lease may be older and HBP.
-
Permalink Reply by Ken Ash on
-
Encana also has applied for 7 Units to be created in the Sligo Field. Sections are 7,16,17,18,19,20,and 21.Township 17 North, Range 12 West. Units are for both LCV and HA.
-
Permalink Reply by SharonB T18N R15W S8 on
-
My friend is in one of these units. The most excitiing part about the notice that I saw is that the hearing is scheduled for 12/5 IN SHREVEPORT AT a hotel.
-
Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on
-
I just received that one also. Thanks Ken.
-
Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on
-
Ken,
A large landowner in this area filed suit against Encana requesting to be released for insufficient production. It shouldn't impact the unitization application, but may impact drilling for 16, 21 and 22, 17W, 12W.
-
Permalink Reply by The_Baron on
-
Sounds like they are trying to break a lease. These suits are difficult to win, espessially when the company is activly exploring.
-
Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on
-
Hi Baron,
They were suing Fite for failure to maintain leases via production and various other violations of the lease. Encana purchased the deep rights and they notified them so that they could correct the problems. It looks like Encana didn't reply to their requests.
-
Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on
-
The bossier suit is #128098.
-
Permalink Reply by The_Baron on
-
Sounds like quite a mess, Was suit started against Fite, and then expanded to Encana after they bought the deep rights?
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
Franklin County, Texas
9 members
-
Cass County, TX
120 members
-
Rusk County
97 members
-
Livingston Parish, LA
34 members
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
