Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by sesport on March 9, 2009 at 12:09

Hmmm, curious & disappointing re. NOT discussing ng. Especially after all the noise CPK has made over HS and Marcellus plays. And it's not like they haven't started drilling & producing some, not like the pipelines aren't in the works. Should we just chalk it up to "national security?" lol

Okay, waiting for the upload.

Thanks - sesport

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by sesport on March 9, 2009 at 15:28

And the US CAP

http://www.us-cap.org/pdf/USCAP_Blueprint.pdf

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on March 10, 2009 at 3:56

I'm going to ask the media guy why this is the case...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by LP on March 10, 2009 at 0:49

It continues to amaze me how many people seem to have a blank space in their heads when it comes to the uses and value of natural gas. Prior to the Haynesville Shale "discovery" I'm sure I would have been among those with a hollow head on the topic too. Having a vested interest in something makes a difference in learning about it.
Suggestion regarding your video; it might be easiest to upload it to UTube.
I'll be checking in today for Part 2 of "Our Ambassador In Washington" series.
Hope some lights come on in the dark empty spaces of the energy politicals.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on March 10, 2009 at 3:36

Very funny...btw lost my chord to the camera need to get a new one. Good call on YouTube

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on March 10, 2009 at 4:09

With all the initial promise the new administration conveyed for natural gas, it is obvious they still view it as a negative because it is a hydrocarbon. This may be reflected in this conference

• ▶ Reply