EPA Launches Hydraulic Fracturing Study on Water Supplies


By IAN TALLEY

WASHINGTON—The Environmental Protection Agency Thursday launched a study to determine whether a key oil and natural gas production technique called hydraulic fracturing is contaminating water supplies.

While environmentalists are concerned that the process may be causing groundwater contamination and are calling for federal oversight, the industry says there is no proof and it is already adequately regulated.

At issue are new natural-gas reservoirs deep below the earth's surface that companies such as Chesapeake EnergyCorp. and XTO Energy Inc. say could multiply the available domestic reserves of a resource that has a fraction of the greenhouse-gas emissions of its fossil fuel cousins, coal and oil.

"Our research will be designed to answer questions about the potential impact of hydraulic fracturing on human health and the environment," said Paul Anastas, assistant administrator for EPA's Office of Research and Development. "The study will be conducted through a transparent, peer-reviewed process, with significant stakeholder input," he said in a statement.

Reps. Diana DeGette, (D., Colo.), and Maurice Hinchey, (D., N.Y.), cosponsors of legislation to bring hydraulic fracturing under EPA regulation, said the study would be a significant step in ensuring drinking water is protected.

The American Petroleum Institute said in a statement, "We expect the study to confirm what 60 years of experience and investigation have already demonstrated: that hydraulic fracturing is a safe and well understood technology for producing oil and natural gas."

Lee Fuller, head of the petroleum-industry group EnergyInDepth, said that if the review "is based on objective, scientific analysis, it will serve as an opportunity to highlight the host of steps taken at every wellsite that make certain groundwater is properly protected."

Facing increasing pressure from some Democratic lawmakers and environmentalists, the EPA said in its proposed budget earlier this year it planned to conduct a study of the process.

Previous studies by the EPA—including one review of the process for coalbed methane extraction at much shallower levels—haven't found hydraulic fracturing carries a risk of water contamination.

Although the states regulate the actual process of hydraulic fracturing—known as fracking—the EPA already regulates the waste-water systems that either re-inject it into reservoirs or send it to waste-treatment facilities.

Last month, Steve Heare, director of the EPA's Drinking Water Protection Division, said at a conference he hadn't seen any documented cases that the fracking process was contaminating water supplies.

Bill Kappel, a U.S. Geological Survey official, said at the same conference that contamination of water supplies is more likely to happen as companies process the waste water from hydrofracking. In some instances, municipal water systems that treat the water have reported higher levels of heavy metals and radioactivity.

"Treatment of the [waste] water hasn't caught up with the hydrofracking technology," Mr. Kappel said.

Although legislation in the House and Senate to bring greater federal oversight of the hydrofracking process hasn't gained momentum, Mr. Heare said even if such proposals are approved, it wouldn't likely have a dramatic effect on regulation. States would still have the right under the Safe Drinking Water Act to use their own regulatory standards.

Write to Ian Talley at ian.talley@dowjones.com

Views: 56

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Lethalinjection: Well said! jhh
pssst, You DO know that there was already a scandal about government climate studies, don't you. Something to do with manipulated data, e-mails ... you sure you trust the EPA studies that were already conducted?

80)
I assume you want us to know you have a sense of humor, Yes we are all aware of when unknown hackers exposed the fraud at East Anglia University and hearings should be held to prosecute the masterminds who have now given Scientists a bad name. These hackers helped expose "THE greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people." taken from Don Inhofe.
Bless these ANONYMOUS heroes who should be rewarded!! (the hackers)
lol, Yes I do (have a sense of humor), and this has just tickled me to no end!!!

So, the question remains (and is reinforced by JHH's newest topic about the EIA data) ... IF indeed the climate data is unreliable enough for those who are skeptical about climate change as a basis for their arguments against things like cap & trade, how is it these same skeptics put such faith in the EPA/government's findings about the frac process?

Can't have it both ways, IMO. lol 80)
continuing the sense of humor... maybe. "I'm from the government and here to help" jhh

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service