Fraud Free Zone
Commentary and review of The New Trough - Naomi Klein's article in Rolling Stone's November 13, 2008 issue
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/24012700/the_new_trough
The details are starting to emerge on the Bailout and it is apparent this criminal administration and Congress are at it again. It was bad enough to send partisan republicans to Iraq to hand out Plane Loads of money to Contractors, but this latest scam takes the cake.
Reuben Jeffrey III is named the chief investment officer for the bailout program. This is the guy who as chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission between 05 and 07 who advocated for flexibility in regulation, which did not regulate the high risk trading at the heart of the meltdown.
Jeffrey, who was also part of the Bremer CPA in Baghdad in the early days. He ws in charge of hiring a staff who's function was to hand over plane loads of money to private contractors. When asked by Congress what he learned he said contracts should be handed out with more speed and flexibility.
So we are now outsourcing the bailout with no time for a bidding process or the drafting of rigorous rules to make sure those applying do not have conflicts of interest. In other words, an open invitation to bullshit about how they love their country and can be trusted to regulate themselves.
Six law firms were invited to bid for the first major contract. Four declined because of conflicts of interest. The firm awarded the contract - Simpson Thacher & Bartlett apparently takes a more relaxed approach to conflicts of interest.
It provided legal support to companies trading mortgage-backed securities - the financial WMDs as Warren Buffett called them, that detonated the banking industry.
This firm was hired to spend $250 billion of the bailout money to purchase equity in Americas banks. The first stage was to buy stakes in 9 of the country's top banks - 7 of which this firm represented.
This firm agreed to not represent these banks against the US when they negotiate with Treasury for the equity money. This firm has retained the right to represent banks when they apply for other parts of the $700 billion bailout not covered by its contract. The conflicts of interest increase further when you look at Simpson Thacher's lead lawyer; Lee Meyerson, who personally represented 3 of the 9 banks bailed out in the first round.
This firm could act right, but the first test wasn't reassuring. the deal to give the 9 banks $125 billion to ease the credit crunch; crippling the economy, in the form of badly needed loans. Problem is no one put this in writing. The part about lending money to homeowners and small businesses was implied - not required. There is no obligation for the banks to lend the money one way or the other says a Treasury spokeswomen. We're not looking to control their operations.
Many of the banks appear to have no intention of wasting the money on loans; at least for the next quarter. The CFO for Citigroup; Gary Crittenden, has hinted his company would use its share of the cash - $25 billion - to buy up competitors. He said the buyouts present the possibility of taking advantage of opportunities that might normally be closed to us.
Add to this Morgan Stanley planning to pay themselves $10.7 billion this year, much of it in bonuses. Not only do the taxpayers save this company, we are funding their 2008 bonuses.
England's Gordon Brown negotiated a similar bailout, but with meaningful guarantees for taxpayers, voting rights at banks, seats on the boards, 12% annual dividend payments to the government, suspension of dividend payments to shareholders, restrictions on executive bonuses and legal requirements that the banks lend money to homeowners and small businesses.
We got no controlling interest in banks we saved, no voting rights, no seats on the boards and 5% in dividend payouts to the government while shareholders continue to colle ct dividends. Golden parachute and bonuses already promised by the banks will still be paid out to executives.
The day after Paulson met with the top banks, Treasury announced Bank of New York Mellon would receive the contract of Master Custodian of the bailout. Bank of Mellon has a bad record for mischief. $22.5 billion money laundering lawsuit in Moscow and has been forced to pay out $14 million in settlements.
The contract prohibits unethical behavior, but the arrangement is rife for abuse. Mellon holds $1.2 billion in subprime mortgage securities. It will rceive $3 billion as part of the equity program and be eligible to apply for taxpayer money from the program it is being paid to administer.
This is a must read article. All this information can be independently checked out. Of course, always remember if you want the facts to go your way, turn a blind eye to what does not fit into ones world view.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/24012700/the_new_trough
The details are starting to emerge on the Bailout and it is apparent this criminal administration and Congress are at it again. It was bad enough to send partisan republicans to Iraq to hand out Plane Loads of money to Contractors, but this latest scam takes the cake.
Reuben Jeffrey III is named the chief investment officer for the bailout program. This is the guy who as chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission between 05 and 07 who advocated for flexibility in regulation, which did not regulate the high risk trading at the heart of the meltdown.
Jeffrey, who was also part of the Bremer CPA in Baghdad in the early days. He ws in charge of hiring a staff who's function was to hand over plane loads of money to private contractors. When asked by Congress what he learned he said contracts should be handed out with more speed and flexibility.
So we are now outsourcing the bailout with no time for a bidding process or the drafting of rigorous rules to make sure those applying do not have conflicts of interest. In other words, an open invitation to bullshit about how they love their country and can be trusted to regulate themselves.
Six law firms were invited to bid for the first major contract. Four declined because of conflicts of interest. The firm awarded the contract - Simpson Thacher & Bartlett apparently takes a more relaxed approach to conflicts of interest.
It provided legal support to companies trading mortgage-backed securities - the financial WMDs as Warren Buffett called them, that detonated the banking industry.
This firm was hired to spend $250 billion of the bailout money to purchase equity in Americas banks. The first stage was to buy stakes in 9 of the country's top banks - 7 of which this firm represented.
This firm agreed to not represent these banks against the US when they negotiate with Treasury for the equity money. This firm has retained the right to represent banks when they apply for other parts of the $700 billion bailout not covered by its contract. The conflicts of interest increase further when you look at Simpson Thacher's lead lawyer; Lee Meyerson, who personally represented 3 of the 9 banks bailed out in the first round.
This firm could act right, but the first test wasn't reassuring. the deal to give the 9 banks $125 billion to ease the credit crunch; crippling the economy, in the form of badly needed loans. Problem is no one put this in writing. The part about lending money to homeowners and small businesses was implied - not required. There is no obligation for the banks to lend the money one way or the other says a Treasury spokeswomen. We're not looking to control their operations.
Many of the banks appear to have no intention of wasting the money on loans; at least for the next quarter. The CFO for Citigroup; Gary Crittenden, has hinted his company would use its share of the cash - $25 billion - to buy up competitors. He said the buyouts present the possibility of taking advantage of opportunities that might normally be closed to us.
Add to this Morgan Stanley planning to pay themselves $10.7 billion this year, much of it in bonuses. Not only do the taxpayers save this company, we are funding their 2008 bonuses.
England's Gordon Brown negotiated a similar bailout, but with meaningful guarantees for taxpayers, voting rights at banks, seats on the boards, 12% annual dividend payments to the government, suspension of dividend payments to shareholders, restrictions on executive bonuses and legal requirements that the banks lend money to homeowners and small businesses.
We got no controlling interest in banks we saved, no voting rights, no seats on the boards and 5% in dividend payouts to the government while shareholders continue to colle ct dividends. Golden parachute and bonuses already promised by the banks will still be paid out to executives.
The day after Paulson met with the top banks, Treasury announced Bank of New York Mellon would receive the contract of Master Custodian of the bailout. Bank of Mellon has a bad record for mischief. $22.5 billion money laundering lawsuit in Moscow and has been forced to pay out $14 million in settlements.
The contract prohibits unethical behavior, but the arrangement is rife for abuse. Mellon holds $1.2 billion in subprime mortgage securities. It will rceive $3 billion as part of the equity program and be eligible to apply for taxpayer money from the program it is being paid to administer.
This is a must read article. All this information can be independently checked out. Of course, always remember if you want the facts to go your way, turn a blind eye to what does not fit into ones world view.
Views: 151
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Duncan McGehee on
-
Starting to look like Klein was correct about the bailout.
-
-
Starting to shut down. Like the Haynesville Shale, we are seeing Companies rescind their offers and pull out of certain areas.
-
Permalink Reply by Dorcheated A1 on -
Great Jim, it fit's right into my kitty box.
-
-
New format ok. My daughter gets the magazine, but my son informed me this was - I believe - the second issue of the new format. I probably like it better, but I really haven't read it in over 20 years, except for an article here and there in the last year.
-
Permalink Reply by Dorcheated A1 on
-
Give me a minute and let me go check mine. I'll be right back.
-
Permalink Reply by Dorcheated A1 on
-
Jim,
I'm gonna say there threaded the same but one look's a little bigger than the other.
-
Permalink Reply by Two Dogs, Pirate on -
They all meet on the backside.
-
Permalink Reply by Dorcheated A1 on
-
Two Dogs,
What's a nice guy like you doing in a post like this.
-
Permalink Reply by Two Dogs, Pirate on
-
Just here to keep everything on the up and up. The bad of both parties meet on the backside, the extremists and the terrorist alike.
-
Permalink Reply by Snake Stewart on
-
Hey Dorcheated,
Wouldnt left wingnuts be left handed threads and right wingnuts be right hand threads ?
Missed you today Bud.
-
Permalink Reply by Martin on
-
No, Left wing nuts are metric. Right wing nuts are American Standard (SAE) ... you either have to be an ME or ....
-
Permalink Reply by Grice on
-
Reuben Jeffrey III is named the interim chief investment officer for the bailout program.
So we are now outsourcing the bailout with no time for a bidding process or the drafting of rigorous rules to make sure those applying do not have conflicts of interest. each participant in the plan, must apply and pass rigorous qualification standard prior to acceptance.
Six law firms were invited to bid for the first major contract. Four declined because of conflicts of interest. This is misleading. While it is true that only six firms were invited to bid for the position, that was because of the high standards the treasury placed on the bidders. Four declined, because they did not desire to meet the restriction that would have been place on them should they be awarded the position.
There is no obligation for the banks to lend the money one way or the other says a Treasury spokeswomen. We're not looking to control their operations. This is correct, but also a bit misleading. To dictate what the banks do with the money, would imply a socialistic banking industry.
Add to this Morgan Stanley planning to pay themselves $10.7 billion this year, much of it in bonuses. Under the qualifications for participation, this would not be allowed. As much as one would like to see this plan as "free" money, the truth is far from it.
The contract prohibits unethical behavior, but the arrangement is rife for abuse. This statement is nothing more that a portrayal of the writers personal fears.
Of course, always remember if you want the facts to go your way, turn a blind eye to what does not fit into ones world view.If they are truly factual, how you view it would not alter its authenticity.
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
149 members
-
North Caddo Parish
358 members
-
Central Texas Gas
63 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
