Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot on February 1, 2009 at 16:46

Please post the section, township and range of the Lincoln Parish well you are speaking of. Somehow I must have missed that one. I haven't been aware of a horizontal CV well in Lincoln Parish.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by North LA on February 1, 2009 at 17:47

I got the information about the CV well from word of mouth so it could be wrong. I couldn't find it either so I'm going to take it off for now.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 1, 2009 at 19:38

North LA, I suspect the well may actually be a Haynesville Shale test even though it has Smackover on the permit.

EnCana, Black Stone Min 13 #H1 Well, Serial #238493, S13-T13N-R10W

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Checkmateking on February 2, 2009 at 4:09

No doubt about it, all the early northern Caddo wells were permitted as smackover.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by North LA on February 2, 2009 at 4:17

Oh well. I guess since they were permitted through the conservation hearing as Jurrasic formation they can call it whatever they want to as long as they are in the JUR formation defined by the DNR.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe Hahn on February 2, 2009 at 5:44

I think you should be referring to serial number 238108. This is the Colbert Well Encana recently completed. Unfortunately, the permit was for the Haynesville Shale and I as understand the engineer made a significant error and went into the "Bossier Shale". As I understand, this is a great well but it will not hold the current lease per the requirements of the permit. As you can see, Encana has already received another permit #239399 to drill another well in the same section, but this time into the Haynesville Shale. As I was told, it they did not do this they would lose the lease on this particular section.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by North LA on February 2, 2009 at 6:04

No I was refering to the well I mentioned because it had Smackover formation listed on the permit. That's very interesting that they made a mistake and went into the bossier and still had a good well. I wonder If both the bossier and HS are productive would it signinficantly increase all estimates of recoverable gas? I mean if you can get a 20mcf well from the HS then drill back another 100-300 feet above the HS and get a 10mcf well that would be huge.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe Hahn on February 2, 2009 at 6:06

Oh YES

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by North LA on February 2, 2009 at 6:15

Do you know how much the Bossier shale well is producing?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe Hahn on February 2, 2009 at 6:27

Nothing officially has come out, but I understand it is good. There were 10 to 12 zones fracked. Not sure if it is good as the horizontal well in the HS Encana did on the Bundrick land. I understand it tested 60 MCF a day, but they had it choked back to 15 to 20 MCF currently

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by North LA on February 2, 2009 at 6:37

60! that's insane

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe Hahn on February 2, 2009 at 6:40

Heard it from 3 to 4 reliable resources including an Encana guy.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page