How Much Natural Gas Do We Have to Replace Gasoline?
Posted by Robert Rapier on July 30, 2009 - 10:06am
Topic: Alternative energy
Tags: gasoline, natural gas [list all tags]

You may have seen the recent news that a report by the Potential Gas Committee says natural gas reserves in 2008 rose to 2,074 trillion cubic feet. The New York Times and the Wall Street Journal (via Rigzone) both had stories on it, and T. Boone Pickens issued a press release. In this post, I will look at how long these reserves might last, if used to replace US gasoline usage.

How Much Do We Need?
The U.S. currently consumes 390 million gallons of gasoline per day. (Source: EIA). A gallon of gasoline contains about 115,000 BTUs. (Source: EPA). The energy content of this much gasoline is equivalent to 45 trillion BTUs per day. The energy content of natural gas is about 1,000 BTUs per standard cubic foot (scf). Therefore, to replace all gasoline consumption would require 45 billion scf per day, or 16.4 trillion scf per year. Current U.S. natural gas consumption is 23 trillion scf per year (Source: EIA). Therefore, replacing all gasoline consumption with natural gas would require a total usage of 39.4 trillion scf per year, an increase in natural gas consumption of 71% over present usage.

Assuming for the sake of argument that the 2,074 trillion standard cubic feet cited in the study is accurate, that the "probable, possible and speculative reserves" eventually equate to actual reserves, and that the gas is economically recoverable, that is enough gas for 53 years of combined current natural gas consumption and gasoline consumption. If you assume that only the proven plus probable reserves are eventually recovered, the amount drops to about 1/3rd of the 2,074 trillion scf estimate, still enough to satisfy current natural gas consumption and replace all gasoline consumption for almost 20 years.

We can also calculate in terms of oil imports. Right now the U.S. imports about 13 million barrels per day of all petroleum products. A barrel of oil contains around 5.8 million BTUs, but oil only makes up 10 million of the 13 million barrel per day figure. Other imports include things like gasoline (4.8 million BTUs/bbl) and ethanol (3.2 million BTUs/bbl). Scanning the list of imports, I probably won't be too far off the mark to presume that the average BTU value of those 13 million bpd of imports is about 5.4 million BTUs/bbl. On an annual basis, this equates to 25.6 trillion scf of natural gas, which would be an increase over current natural gas usage of 111%. Going back to the 2,074 trillion scf from the study, this would be enough to displace imports of all petroleum products (again, at current usage rates and not factoring in declining U.S. oil production) for 43 years.

What's the Cost?
Natural gas is presently trading at about $4 per million (MM) BTU (although December 2009 is trading at almost $6). Oil is presently trading at $71/bbl, which equates to $12.24/MMBTU. Gasoline is presently trading at over $17/MMBTU. Thus, natural gas is a bargain relative to oil or gasoline. Incidentally, I just checked on seasoned wood and wood pellets, and they range from $8-$12/MMBTUs. So it is cheaper to heat your house with gas than with wood. I am not sure I would have guessed that.

While natural gas is a bargain relative to gasoline, converting a gasoline-powered vehicle to natural gas isn't cheap. According to this source, it can cost $12,500 to $22,500 to convert a gasoline-powered car to natural gas. Honda makes a compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicle, but according to this review in Car and Driver the premium over the gasoline version is $8,780. A person would need to drive an awful lot to justify that premium. However, that's what fleets do. They drive a lot. The large price differential explains why fleets would be interested in running their vehicles on natural gas.

Conclusions
So, the good news is that the United States could be energy independent if the newly released natural gas reserve numbers are remotely accurate. It also appears that we have enough natural gas available that civilization isn't going to end any time soon due to lack of energy supplies. There are three caveats. First, energy independence via natural gas could require us to spend significantly more for personal automotive transportation. Second, "possible" reserves may never materialize. Finally, a large chunk of the calculated reserves are based on shale gas, and that requires gas to be in the $6-$8/million BTU range to be economical. Still, it is a bargain compared to gasoline, and it explains why fleets are more receptive to conversion to natural gas than the general public is likely to be for their personal vehicles.


(complete article-It is one persons look at how much natural gas would be required to replace the gasoline we are using today.)

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/5615

Tags: CNG, gas, gasoline, natural, transportation

Views: 87

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

sesport, you get AAA+ for research! I'm not sure if my question has an answer. You'd have to make too many assumptions. One, using the "Red Queen" analogy, is that conventional fields are just bobbing along barely meeting current demand. So, when you start switching a huge number of cars & heavy trucks to natural gas instead of gasoline, all of that demand would have to be supplied from new "unconventional" sources. As per the discussions here, some of those sources are too new to have an average while others like Barnett and Fayettville have lots of data available.

America is capable of amazing industrial feats! All you have to do is go back to WWII and look at what we accomplished. What I hope will happen is that driving Natural Gas cars will become the PATRIOTIC thing to do. If that really takes ahold, we could blow even the "Aggressive" scenario (Cal. paper) out of the water. But it will take the combined might of the private sector and O&G industry with a push from Gov. to get the ball rolling.
Wait, I think we can get close with that 2007 data. We know that approx. 1% of ng is used for transportation, we have a number for annual ng produced, we have an average for the amount produced by wells. Based on those charts, we should be able to SPECULATE an average increase for each factor.

This may be a do-able SPECULATION about future use & wells needed. hmmmmm.....

BTW, did you notice on that production chart that the numbers are going UP?

:0)
Okay, here it is ... my guess is that the secret number will be 4.83 wells. But, since there is no such thing as a fractional well (only frac'ed wells, lol) that number would have to be rounded up to 5 wells. :0)
Did you leave some zeros off somewhere?
Probably, lol! My calculator wouldn't go as high as the billions ... so I took a short cut.

Approx. 1% of production is consumed by transportation.

I figured an average increase in the number of producing wells from 2003 to 2008. I added that average increase to the 2008 figure to come up with a SPECULATIVE number of producing wells for 2009.

Then, I thought since 1% of ng is used for transportation, I could SPECULATE a calculation that 1% of the producing wells would be required to be consumed by transportation.

I do NOT, however, warranty that this SPECULATED number will remain the same over the years as production rates decline.

That's my story, and I'm sticking to it ... until some math whiz decides to debate it. Then I probably haven't got a tire (leg) to stand on. LOL :0)
ROFL!!

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service