Oil & Gas Pro

Latest Chesapeake Haynesville Shale & Bossier Shale Map (10/14/09)

Attached is a Chesapeake map depicting their view of the outline of both the Haynesville Shale and Bossier Shale plays.

Their map of the Bossier Shale explains why there has been such an increase in activity along the southern portion of the Haynesville Shale play and certainly adds some excitement to that region.

Views: 1343

Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


landownerPermalink Reply by ken hatcher on October 14, 2009 at 13:04
Les, john sharp said today on an internet broadcast though early that the bossier was a little less robust than haynesville well's drilled. He went on to say a bossier drilled in august started flowing at 9.4 mcf( below their haynesville average). He is a geoscience with chesapeake. Still 9.4 is not shabby....your thought's? That would appear to be the well on your map.
Permalink Reply by qwert on October 14, 2009 at 14:54
I listened to the webcast, and Sharp said the Bossier Shale was "the most exciting development" in the play since the last analyst meeting a year ago. They are very high on it and he confirmed that CHK actively acquired additional property in the "stacked" Haynesville/Bossier fairway in South DeSoto and North Sabine. A press clipping picked up on the "less robust than the Haynesville" comment, but that statement was not representative of their enthusiasm for the Bossier. I've listened to similar upbeat comments about the Bossier in conference calls by Encana and Comstock, both of whom also have producing horizontals in that shale. The Bossier appears to be picking up some momentum, although each company also confirmed that near term drilling would continue to focus on the Haynesville to HBP the deeper rights.

landownerPermalink Reply by Catfish on October 15, 2009 at 1:30
Jay, what might the EUR's be for both plays in the same section?

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on October 15, 2009 at 3:03
Catfish, Chesapeake's numbers would suggest combined EUR's in the 8.0 - 12.0 Bcf range.

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on October 14, 2009 at 14:54
Ken, I say this an excellent initial well. I need to see more info such as flowing pressure, choke size, lateral length, frac stages, etc to have a fuller opinion. But this is very comparable to the rates from many parts of the Haynesville Shale in Texas and Louisiana. Heck, Chesapeake's own information in their table indicates the Bossier Shale is similar to the Haynesville Shale.

EnCana had stated a few months ago that the Bossier Shale well economics would be similar.

Just think if operators manage to discovery some small Hosston or Cotton Valley stringers while drilling the shale formations that can eventually be produced thru the same wellbores.

landownerPermalink Reply by ken hatcher on October 14, 2009 at 15:49
I thank both of you for the info. I suppose the 3-d shoot in north sabine would tell them if both existed on your land....right??

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on October 14, 2009 at 16:33
Ken, I think the 3-D survey should definitely help delineate both plays but current and future well penetrations will be the best information.

landownerPermalink Reply by North LA on October 14, 2009 at 15:42
nm
Permalink Reply by NUDOG on October 15, 2009 at 3:25
Please help a Nudog understand all this!! If the Haynesville is deeper than the Bossier would it be possible for a person to sign two different leases on each one of these? Also, wouldn't it be more profitable for a company to drill in an area where there are two different pockets of gas instead of just one? THANKS

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on October 15, 2009 at 3:32
Nudog, it would be possible but most companies would prefer all depths to be covered by a single lease.

Yes, it could be potentially more profitable to drill in areas where both the Haynesville and Bossier Shale are present. But given the variation in both formations, this would not necessarily be the case throughout the the overlap area.
Permalink Reply by RC on October 15, 2009 at 3:37
Can you tell me where the Muench well is located? Thanks again for your on-going attention to our collective well being! We are certainly blessed!

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Les Bamburg on October 15, 2009 at 3:41
RC, please see the following:

Chesapeake, Muench 10 #H1 Well, Serial #240186, S10-T10N-R13W, Benson Field, DeSoto Parish

RSS

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content 

1 Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map

Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2 More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs

More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3 Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5

Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4 Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high

Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5 Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push

Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
6 Request For Assistance

Request For Assistance
7 The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

Groups

© 2026   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service