Tags:
You have to remember that when gas is hedged, its not gas from a specific well, but gas from many wells sold in blocks.
For exaple, say I operate 10 wells making 100 mcf/day, so I am making about 1000mcf total a day. I know that my production will decline without any new wells, and I could have a well be shut-infor a short time for repairs, reworking etc. Therefore I wouldn't hedge all my gas because if I sign a contract to deliver gas and fall short, the penelties on my contract will bury me.
So I might hedge 1/2 my gas. What wells does it come from... doesn't matter I am not selling specific gas, just garunteeing delivery of a set amount at a set price.
To further insulate myself, I will set up a marketing company, like CHK does. I will sell my gas to the marketing co. at the wellhead for a set price, probally based on an accepted standard. So lets say its the Henry Hub - 10%. Then the markketing co can hedge the gas for more. As an Operator I have fufilled my obligation to my mineral owners. Yes, they may not benifit from the hedging, but they arent hurt either should I be locked into a low price when prices spike.
PG,
That would be in kind royalty. It would kinda be like a dog chasing a car... what are you going to do with it after you get it?
Yes I understand that. But what about arrangements with a buyer to take it as it come from the well? Perhaps MOs could do a little hedging themselves if that were possible..
Isn't that what the producer is doing?
According to the La. S. Ct.ruling that ALL benefits obtained from a well must be shared proportionately with MIO, then, for each well from which gas is hedged, there is a mineral interest owner and an operator or several operators. to the extent the operators benefit from a well or multiple wells, a viable argument remains that they must share those benefits with the MIO
It is not a viable defense to an obligation to claim gee, I don'[t know which well(s) my gas and derivative benefits derived. This is because there is a presumption in the law that he in charge knows what he's in charge of (to paraphrase). Moreover, it would be a relatively simple calculation as there are records of quantum produced from each well as well as records of each hedge.
To attempt to "insulate" oneself from obligations to market and obtain best price via inserting a marketing company, that marketing company had better be a legitimate distinct entity and that transaction best be reasonably prudent. Moreover, if say the operator does sell the gas to a marketing company at the wellhead, then that operator has nothing to hedge. But, if the operator is using the marketing company as a foil to its efforts to increase its profits w/o sharing proportionately with landowner, there is a problemo if the La. S. Ct. pronouncement applies, which it appears precisely to do just that.
I propose this simply as legitimate debate.
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com