The following news item isn't a great foreshadowing for gas prices going forward:

"EnCana said it had hedged about 1.4 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day at an average price of $6.21 per thousand cubic feet for the next gas year, which runs from 1 November until 31 October 2010. "

If producers are hedging 2010 gas at a little over $6 for next year, things aren't looking great. Of course, that beats the snot out of the sub $4 range we are seeing now. This hedged price is the Henry Hub price so actual field values are going to be lower, depending on the location basis differentials.

Most studies I'm seeing target $5-6 gas (HH) for a decent ROR for HS wells, assuming all of the recovery/rate numbers prove to be true. This should allow HS to continue to move forward, but still not at a break-neck pace. Just a healthly above-average pace, which is pretty darned good!

Views: 53

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

CB, have you priced a CD recently? You're lucky if can get 1.5%. I have "worked the numbers".
Mmmarkkk, just keep in mind the significant LNG imports in 2010 unless the Asian economies start to recover. Demand recovery in the US is still the wildcard and will be the main determining factor.
Why does everyone on this site ignore the published return projections in the presentations from the E&P companies as to the returns at various NG prices and EURs. There are liabilities in the securities markets and it is just a mathematical calculation once you put in assumptions for IP, decline rates, LOE and NG prices.

I agree with Mark that lease costs are "sunk costs" when an E&P company makes a decision to drill or not. However, if your take a lease costs of $5,000/acre(HK's)( even though CHK's is negative because of the PXP JV, EXCO is really cheap because 75% is HBP with CV production and ECA/SWEPI is very low). BUT, using $5,000/acre, IP of 10 mmcfd. decline rates of 80%, 30%, 25% and 8% to terminus, LOE of $.25 mcf (HK says $.10 for first three years), NG of $6 (check the 2010 strip which is over $6), you get 7.1 bcf EUR and a pre-tax IRR return of 48%.

WHAT is wrong with a pre-tax return of 48%? Do all the experts on this site quoting unnamed analysts think HK, CHK, EXCO, EOG, XTO, ECA, SWEPI, and STR DON'T know anything about the NG business and are frittering away $3.5 Billion of stockholder money in 2009 drilling uneconomic wells.
If you believe everything these companys say, I have some swamp land in Plaquemines Parish I want to sell you. You think Enron and AIG told you everything. These companys are playing up everything to the extremes( decline rates, EURs,operating costs-$.25 BS I pay more than that with insurance, pumpers, ad valorem tax, SW disposal, severance tax, admin, repairs, and a million other things ). I would too, to drive up the stock price. Lease costs are sunk costs, but still go into the bottom line of profitability. Strip doesn't mean anything, it's what you actually get at the time you sell it. They are losing $ on every well they drill at Today's $, and will pay for it in the future

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service