Smackover Sand Deposit
Encana has permitted to this formation in north Desoto. I have heard that Petrohawk has 2 test wells to the Smackover in south Caddo. Is this a 3rd gas formation or part of Bossier and or Haynesville?
Views: 1239
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by adubu on
-
Jack Blake--- look at Goodrich Petroleum web site and click on 6/29/2010 presentation page 11 you with find a picture of the formations and there relationship to each other
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on -
Jack, yes - the Haynesville Shale is below the Bossier Shale. That is the reason some companies refer to the Haynesville Shale as the Lower Bossier Shale.
-
Permalink Reply by Marc Stepman on
-
Hi Les B
Is there a list of Parishes that have had Smackover production?
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on
-
Marc, I believe at minimum the following parishes in NLA have Smackover production.
Bossier, Claiborne, Lincoln, Union & Webster
-
Permalink Reply by Marc Stepman on
-
Thanks Les
I appreciate the information. Perhaps as information gets better other Parishes will join the list. Smackover has been going along time. Why do you think they have a renewed interest in it all of a sudden?
-
Permalink Reply by Marc Stepman on
-
Profits drive everything. With the state of the economy the price of I think will go up. More drilling and better technology also lowers the cost of drilling. Thus profits go up and things looks appealing. Lets see what happens.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Aubrey C. Sanders, Jr. on
-
OIL is currently more profitable. Bottom line.
-
Permalink Reply by olddog573 on
-
this thread is very interesting. it's a nice change of pace as the oil spill has taken up alot of everyones focus over the last 70+ days.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Marc Stepman on
-
It think that also helps out a bunch.
-
-
-
I haven't read the entire thread but has anybody brought up the possibility that they are considering the Smackover because it can hold HS rights and might be more economical at current ng prices? I imagine if this were true there would be some unhappy mineral owners.
-
Permalink Reply by ALongview on
-
I read a report from a while back about the Smackover/Haynesville trend that said this "The Haynesville shoal trend along the West side of the Sabine Uplift lagoon has been a significant productive trend. It seems very likely that this trend continues South to the West side of the Sabine Island, where Cotton Valley rocks rest on Paleozoic strata. Also, the shoal trend must continue in some form on the East side of the Sabine Island and the lagoon.....Shoals around the Sabine Island will be found at substantial depths, due to the thick Tertiary cover in the area." Also "Conditions favorable for pinnacle reefs should continue throughout Southern East Texas and around the Sabine Island." Could someone please interpret this and explain it in plain language. Shoals? Pinnacle Reefs? Is these usually productive for dry gas? wet gas? oil?
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
Livingston Parish, LA
34 members
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
149 members
-
North Caddo Parish
358 members
-
Central Texas Gas
63 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
