by Euan Mearns
With West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Brent close to their January 2015 lows some readers are wondering how these lows compare with historic lows when the oil price is adjusted for inflation (deflated). BP just happen to provide an oil price series that is adjusted for inflation (Figure 1). The data are annual averages and based on Brent since 1984. Annual averages conceal the extreme swings in price that tend to be short lived. At time of writing WTI front month future contract was $44.42 and Brent front month future was $49.92.
Figure 1 The blue line gives the annual average oil price (Brent since 1984) in money of the day and the red line adjusted for inflation expressed in $2014. Three large spikes in the oil price are evident in the 1860s, 1970s and 2010s. It is notable that the magnitude of each spike is similar, of the order $100 to $120 (adjusted to 2014 $). The 1860s and 1970s spikes were followed by long bear markets for the oil price, lasting for 110 years in the case of 1864 to 1973.
To understand what was going on 1861 to 1973 I suggest readers read The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil Money and Power that earned author Daniel Yergin the Pulitzer Prize. It is a tremendous read. Most of us are however, more interested in how today’s prices compare with recent slumps, most notably the slump of 1986 and 1998 (Figure 2).
Figure 2 The main events, Acts 1 to 6, are described briefly below.
To get straight to the point. Brent will need to fall below $30 to match the lows seen in 1986 and to below $20 to match the lows seen in 1998. WTI in particular is trading close to its support level of $43.39 marked on 17 March 2015. If traders push the price below that level then the price could fall a lot lower for a brief period. At the fundamental level, supply and demand need to be rebalanced and the main problem is over-supply of LTO from the USA and of OPEC crude depending upon which way one views the problem. The recent price action since September 2014 has been brutal on producers but not yet brutal enough to remove the 3 million bpd over supply from the system. I do not believe that the white knight of increased demand is about to gallop over the hill and therefore see a risk of substantially lower price in the months ahead. Colleague Arthur Berman has a somewhat more upbeat perspective.
The large scale structure of oil price history is shaped by supply and demand driven by both political dimensions and industry action and innovation. The main landmarks are:
1. The 1973 Yom Kippur war followed by the 1974 oil embargo. The amount of crude withheld from market by OPEC was relatively small (Figure 3) but was sufficient to cause the first oil price shock.
Figure 3 Oil exports for selected OPEC countries based on BP 2014.
2. The 1979 Iranian Revolution followed by the 1980 Iran-Iraq war led to the second oil shock. The price reaction at this time did not reflect the fundamentals of supply and demand and gravity soon took over sending the price down again in the years that followed together with OPEC market share.
3. The 1986 slump was caused by OPEC reasserting its authority and trying to reclaim market share that led to a prolonged bear market that culminated in 1998 when the world was awash in oil.
4. The low point since the first oil shock was marked by $10 oil (money of the day) in 1998. I remember it well since I was running an oil related business at that time. This heralded in a new era for the industry that went through a massive restructuring with many household names being swallowed up by the super-majors.
5. The commodities bull run that began around 2002 that lasted to 2008 or 2014 depending upon one’s perspective had complex reasons from a perceived peak in conventional oil production, the Chinese industrial revolution, expansion of debt, zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) and bubblenomics. Rune Likvern gives a good account of the links between the oil price and economic policies.
6. The 2008 financial crash brought an end to phase 1 of the bull run that was re-inflated by OPEC cutting supply and QE blowing more liquidity into the bubble until 2014.
Rune argues that an end to QE in the USA is implicated in recent global currency adjustments and the rout of the oil price and that is surely part of the story. But the OPEC policy of maintaining market share and over supply of either LTO or OPEC crude have also played a prominent role in Act 7 that is still being played out and still has a way to run before a new market equilibrium is reached.
republished with permission
Tags:
Keith,
I've been predicting $20 or below ever since the Iran deal was announced. That I see no way around and I have no idea how long it will be at that level. What the Saudis started has not played out yet. I still maintain they started this to stop the shale drilling here in the US. The problem now is where will it end and when. There are new factors that come into play daily.
Yeah, the dictating factor here seems to be the Saudis and I hear varying ideas on how long they are willing to keep it flowing. Does anyone think they will continue to up their production as our's goes down?
The guys in the Houston area that I have touch with thought that the price would have bottomed in the 40's by July. I agreed. Then this STUPID Iran deal came up and all bets are off. This brings a lot of surplus oil to market plus the increase in production that Iran can now market going forward. On top of this we've had devaluation of currencies which make the dollar stronger and a weaking of the overall economy of the world. Its the perception that the market has and not the real value of the oil. It would take a drastic cut in production and I don't see that happening. This idea about market share is stupid. Market share will always be there and will very from day to day. You have to anticipate market price and match that to market price. Especially, a group like OPEC.
The thing that I don't understand is why the American economy has not turned around because of the lower price of oil. I thought the drop in the price oil this would have started a boom but it has not. Any ideas why this has not happened?
As a number of recent articles have pointed out, the possibility of Iranian crude entering the market is not going to have a significant impact on global crude prices. Falling demand and rising supply, other than what Iran might bring to market, are the factors responsible for current commodity prices. The US economy is in fact quite robust when compared against the rest of the world's major economies. Those countries account for most of the drop in demand. I think two realities are on the horizon: crude below $40 and a period of bankruptcies and mergers and acquisitions. The predictions that I have read most recently, and with which I tend to agree, are that 2017 should see the US energy industry's business model reconfigured (more efficient, more competitive) and rising demand for oil and particularly for natural gas, in all its forms. Market share is exactly what will drive this paradigm shift.
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com