Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Ed on February 8, 2013 at 6:39

002-ALT

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 8, 2013 at 6:45

http://sonlite.dnr.state.la.us/sundown/cart_prod/cart_con_wellinfo2...

WELLS

SERIAL	WELL NAME	WELL NUM	ORG ID	FIELD	PARISH	PROD TYPE	SEC	TWN	RGE	EFFECTIVE DATE	API NUM
245963	L SMK RA SUG;DEAN 31-22-1	002-ALT	S085	7145	56	00	031	22N	01E	02/08/2013	17111256280000

PRMT DATE	SPUD DATE	STAT DATE	ST CD
02/08/2013		02/08/2013	01

WELL SURFACE COORDINATES

Surface Longitude	Surface Latitude	Lambert X	Lambert Y	Ground Elevation	Zone	Datum
0-0-0	0-0-0	2029457	794526	190	N	NAD-27

WELL SURFACE COORDINATES GENERATED BY DNR

UTMX 83	UTMY 83	LONGITUDE 83	LATITUDE 83
Not on file	Not on file	Not on file	Not on file

BOTTOM HOLE COORD

EFFECTIVE DATE	END DATE	PLUGBACK TOTAL DEPTH	TRUE VERTICAL DEPTH	MEASURED DEPTH	LAT DEG	LAT MIN	LAT SEC	LONG DEG	LONG MIN	LONG SEC	COORDINATE SOURCE	LAMBERT X	LAMBERT Y	ZONE	COORDINATE SYSTEM
02/08/2013			10300	14100							02	2029457	798526	N	01
02/08/2013			10300	14100	32	51	42.89	92	24	15.21	02			N	02

WELL HISTORY

SERIAL	WELL NAME	WELL NUM	ORG ID	FIELD	ST CD	PT	WELL CLASS	EFF DATE	END DATE	STAT DATE
245963	L SMK RA SUG;DEAN 31-22-1	002-ALT	S085	7145	01	00		02/08/2013		02/08/2013

SCOUT INFO

REPORT DATE	WELL STATUS	MEASURED DEPTH	TRUE VERT DEPTH	DETAIL
02/08/2013	01	14100		2267' FSL & 2170' FEL OF SEC 31. PBHL: 1005' FSL & 2182' FEL OF SEC 30.

Permalink Reply by ddozier on February 8, 2013 at 9:06

Interesting the lateral is a bit shorter than some of the others. At least some activity there started to gin up.

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 8, 2013 at 9:29

I noticed that also.  As the permit was entered in the database today, it will be a few more days before the permit and plat are available.  Maybe that will shed some light on the short permitted lateral length.

Permalink Reply by Bradley McWilliams on February 8, 2013 at 10:17

I guess this is SWN?

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 8, 2013 at 11:24

Yes.

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 9, 2013 at 5:13

Those members wishing to track this well should click on the following link and bookmark it for future reference:

http://sonlite.dnr.state.la.us/sundown/cart_prod/cart_con_wellinfo2...

Permalink Reply by ddozier on February 9, 2013 at 7:44

Interesting they have surveyed across my property for the gas pipeline associated with I presume this well. Time will tell.

Permalink Reply by obed w odom on February 9, 2013 at 10:34

As was discussed on GHS 2 or 3 months ago, the majority of this L SMK RA SUG unit seems to be Exxon fee land so SWN must have reached some sort of agreement with Exxon-Mobil.

http://ucmwww.dnr.state.la.us/ucmsearch_070611/UCMRedir.aspx?url=ht...

Permalink Reply by Ed on February 9, 2013 at 11:23

Look at well location New well

2267' FSL & 2170' FEL OF SEC 31

Now look at well location 1st Dean well

2210' FEL & 2308' FSL OF SEC 31.

Only 60 ft apart.

Permalink Reply by obed w odom on February 9, 2013 at 13:52

Here is the link to DNR Field Order No. 136-C-4 of Jan 4, 2013, approving L SMK RA SUG. The plat showing the surface location and PBHL of the Dean No. 2 alternate unit well is on page 4, but the PBHL (1005' FSL of Sec. 30) given with the permit of 2/8/13 seems to be somewhat north of what is shown on the plat.

http://ucmwww.dnr.state.la.us/ucmsearch/UCMRedir.aspx?url=http%3a%2...

Permalink Reply by obed w odom on February 14, 2013 at 5:45

Below is the link to the DNR approval of 2/8/13 of the drilling permit for the Dean No. 2 alternate well in L SMK RA SUG. The plat is on page 6. It's interesting that all of the land listed as Exxon-Mobil on the previous plat is now listed as owned by Plum Creek Timber, but I guess Exxon-Mobil may still own the minerals.

http://ucmwww.dnr.state.la.us/ucmsearch/UCMRedir.aspx?url=http%3a%2...

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page