Michael D. Guice's Discussions (3)
| Discussions Replied To (2) | Replies | Latest Activity |
|---|---|---|
|
landowner "Did the division order come from Chesapeake or Petrohawk? Mike"Michael D. Guice replied Dec 17, 2009 to Section 36 T13N-r14W collocated w/Section 25, T13W-r14W well#239709 |
4 |
Dec 17, 2009 Reply by Michael D. Guice |
|
landowner "Kittycatamma Thank you. You're the first person to confirm all the rumors. Mike"Michael D. Guice replied Dec 7, 2009 to Section 36 T13N-r14W collocated w/Section 25, T13W-r14W well#239709 |
4 |
Dec 17, 2009 Reply by Michael D. Guice |
📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Visit the Forum and click "Follow" after the last discussion.
Visit the Forum and click "Follow" after the last discussion.
Top Content
Groups
-
North LA Cotton Valley C…
68 members
-
Shelby County, TX
478 members
-
Nacogdoches County
194 members
-
SMACKOVER LITHIUM GROUP …
11 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
405 members
-
WESTERN HAYNESVILLE
18 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
250 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
457 members
-
SMACKOVER LITHIUM GROUP …
11 members
-
San Augustine, TX
388 members
Blog Posts
Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??
Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
