Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on December 11, 2008 at 11:54

Badly written article as it was three wells rather than four and did not include the test rate of the Sample 9 #1 Well at 28.2 MMcfd.

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 11, 2008 at 12:10

Les. Saw the article also. It popped up on my computer alerts. Since I had read or skimmed about a dozen or more previous on-line reports on the same wells, I shook my head at it's poor attempt at reporting the facts and deleted. There are a myriad of sources for information concerning the HS. The Bossier Press is not one of them. No offense, Gary. I appreciate all the members that participate by making posts. Please continue to post whatever you think has relevance. If you would like to know how to set up computer alerts, contact me. But be prepared for an avalanche of reports hashing and rehashing the same topics over. And over, and over. You got to be seriously interested to put up with the cyber tsunami that will follow.