CHESAPEAKE APPLIES TO TAKE OVER HA UNITS FROM XTO
CHK has applied to the Commissioner to replace XTO as operator of the following HA units in the Converse Field: HA RA SU77 - Section 21 - 9N -13W, HA RA SU83 - Section 15 - 9N -13W and HA RA SU84 - Section 22 - 9N - 13W,
http://ucmwww.dnr.state.la.us/ucmsearch_070611/UCMRedir.aspx?url=ht...
Views: 891
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by J B Nabors on -
IMO, that is unfortunate.
Chesapeake is my "least favored" operator. They have been to court many many times for actions unfavorable to mineral owners. Examples: for failing to honor a "No Cost" clause in a lease, and for selling production to a subsidiary at below market prices. We have a well that is partly owned by Plains--and Chesapeake consistently pays significantly less per MCF than Plains for the same time period. -
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??
In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near…
ContinuePosted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
© 2025 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
