Replies to This Discussion

landownerPermalink Reply by ALongview on February 25, 2010 at 16:34

Nothing yet. The IP was higher at 21mmcf than the Red River 257 #1 referenced above which IP'd at 18mmcf. The Red River 257 #2 referenced in the original post on this thread was a middle bossier completion at 11mmcf so it will be interesting to see how this one comes in after a full month to compare the two formations.

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 25, 2010 at 17:13

Burrows 1H
Oct. - 284,967
Nov.- 512,574
Dec. -325,249
Total-1,122,790 in 90 days (or less).

landownerPermalink Reply by adubu on February 27, 2010 at 5:55

jffree---Common probably purchased the deep right of everything below the Cotton Valley ,so they are not necessary in JV but could be.

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 27, 2010 at 6:19

Don't know adubu but I was just reading SWN transcript and someone asked whether they might do a JV in this area... and the response was that they already had one in place. Look around page 6 in Q&A on Seeking Alpha.

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on February 27, 2010 at 6:37

The only thing I've seen in print about a JV is from 4Q-2008 announcements. Look at page 12 of this press release.

Attachments:

• 2008 year end.pdf, 246 KB

Permalink Reply by RBH on March 2, 2010 at 9:03

big filing in Nac also--so JV covers Nac, shelby, san augustine

Permalink Reply by RBH on March 2, 2010 at 8:59

did not know if anyone had seen this yet for the XTO rudy mitchell #1H:
Filing Operator: XTO ENERGY INC. (945936) Medium: EDI District: 06
Type: Original RRC Identifier: 679562
Received: 01/29/2010 Gas Well #:
Field Name Lease Name Gas Well No.
WILDCAT RUDY MITCHELL 1H

Oil/Condensate (whole barrels) Gas/Casinghead Gas - MCF
Prod
Month Commingle
Permit No. On Hand
Beginning of Month Production Disposition On Hand
End of Month Formation
Production Disposition
Volume Code Volume Code
12/2009 0 0 0 125,549 125,549 02
11/2009 123808 MCF

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page