Tommy Munds's Discussions (19)
| Discussions Replied To (1) | Replies | Latest Activity |
|---|---|---|
"Thanks for the replies. Your answer of section 27 being where the removal is from wa…"Tommy Munds replied Jan 30, 2010 to Section 22 T16N R15W |
6 |
Apr 6, 2010 Reply by Bunky Evans |
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Groups
-
SMACKOVER LITHIUM GROUP …
5 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
402 members
-
SMACKOVER LITHIUM GROUP …
6 members
-
SMACKOVER LITHIUM GROUP …
6 members
-
WESTERN HAYNESVILLE
7 members
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
247 members
-
Franklin County, Texas
11 members
-
North Caddo Parish
360 members
-
DeSoto Parish
689 members
Blog Posts
Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??
In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near…
ContinuePosted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments
Not a member? Get our email.
© 2025 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
