386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Comment Wall (1 comment)
You need to be a member of GoHaynesvilleShale.com to add comments!
Join GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Bubba, I just saw my earlier response about promising to get back to you with a more detailed answer. Here it is. As I mentioned previously, lessees do not agree to Continuous Drilling Clauses for the average mineral owner. Since a lessor can't get a CDC they must depend on beneficial and protective lease language to balance their interests. Some mineral owners may have sufficient acreage to allow them to get a lease covering a limited and defined formation or zone. All mineral owners should get a standard depth clause often called a Vertical Pugh clause. That clause limits a lessee development rights based on the deepest production established in the primary term of the lease. Why would a lessor not want multiple wells? The more wells drilled the better. Every leasing case is different as every mineral estate, Play and active operators combine to create unique circumstances. Therefore it is difficult to give specific suggestions to general leasing questions. Regards, Skip