activitiy doesn't necessarily mean a new post - it maye mean someone popping in and reading a post or that the activity thread at the bottom refreshed. As you know new info post it in there. Thanks for the message.
MFSIL, I tried to add a picture, but apparently it did not work. If you find a picture of LBP, please add it to my site. That's what I think I am--a gatherer of sheep.
For example, the Pugh clause in Alex's lease form provides, in part:
In the event a portion or portions of the land herein leased is pooled or unitized with other land so as to form a pooled unit or units, operations on or production from such unit or units will maintain this lease in force only as to the land included in such unit or units.
I'll keep looking for a more restrictive provision.
In looking through all the lease materials, I've not seen a provision that goes as far as to terminate the lease where the E&P is trying to HBP a unit with a single well. All the Pugh clauses I've seen only prohibit acres outside a producing unit being HBP. The continuous operations clauses I've seen are actually for the benefit of the E&P -- it allows acres to be held not only by production, but by active drilling operations.
I think that somewhere in the lease materials I've compiled there is a "continuous operations" clause that deals with Mike's concern. I need to go back and find that.
Comment Wall (10 comments)
You need to be a member of GoHaynesvilleShale.com to add comments!
Join GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Oil & Gas ProSkip Peel - Mineral Consultant said…
Oil & Gas ProSkip Peel - Mineral Consultant said…
landownerKeith Mauck (Site Publisher) said…
In the event a portion or portions of the land herein leased is pooled or unitized with other land so as to form a pooled unit or units, operations on or production from such unit or units will maintain this lease in force only as to the land included in such unit or units.
I'll keep looking for a more restrictive provision.
So much to learn.