"The ole Pencil whipping"
Quattro's Discussions
1st Month for Expand reporting
6 Replies
Started this discussion. Last reply by full name May 3.
Mineral Prescription scenario
5 Replies
Started this discussion. Last reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant Aug 14, 2024.
Two Questions - Prescription/Reversion of minerals and ownership of pad sites
6 Replies
Started this discussion. Last reply by Quattro Sep 4, 2023.
Quattro's Page
Latest Activity
"And for a multitude of reasons, companies will invest in Texas all things being equal."
"Downward price pressure."
full name replied to Quattro's discussion 1st Month for Expand reporting"The reason there are two contracts is due to Encana's error. They missed some property in a couple of sections. While the terms are somewhat, the difference is covered in the owners decimal interest, not in price. There were…"
Rock Man replied to Quattro's discussion 1st Month for Expand reporting"Issue here may be tied to SWN and CHK having separate gas contracts and each company taking their share of gas "in kind" instead of letting the operator sell / market the gas for the non op WI owners.
Question moving ahead should be…"
full name replied to Quattro's discussion 1st Month for Expand reporting"I found a few interesting items on they Expand check. I have a location that is 1/2 SWN and 1/2 Chesapeake. Expand still reports them as two different line items and prices on each well. I have another location that has two…"
JAMES SMITH replied to Quattro's discussion 1st Month for Expand reporting"GM..I received a deposit from Chesapeake $300 on April 25 but the amount was $1400 less than what I received in Jan/Feb/Mar from deposits from Sepco. I know they fluctuate but seem like that’s a big drop unless I should be receiving one from…"
"That's a good point Skip. "
Comment Wall (2 comments)
- At 7:19 on April 28, 2025, Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant said…
I did a little digging into the specifics of Section 7 - 10N -12W because I thought there might be some public record information behind the offer you received. I wondered it I had missed a field order or one or more well permits. The $18,000/NMA offer seemed to indicate that there should be something but I found nothing. Out of curiosity, I asked one of the mineral companies that I like and trust to give me an offer for Section 7. I didn't tell them what your offer was nor who you were. Their offer was a little higher, $18,250/NMA. This goes to show you how competitive the market for Haynesville minerals has become. I would advise waiting for a field order and/or well permits should you care to sell all or a portion of the interest. Good Luck.
- At 14:32 on June 1, 2023, Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant said…
You can email me at hpeel@haynesvilleminerals.com
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??
In researching the decades-old Tuscaloosa Trend and the immense wealth it has generated for many, I find it deeply troubling that this resource-rich formation runs directly beneath one of the poorest communities in North Baton Rouge—near Southern University, Louisiana—yet neither the university ( that I am aware of) nor local residents appear to have received any compensation for the minerals extracted from their land.
This area has suffered immense environmental degradation…
ContinuePosted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
Bienville Parish, LA
246 members
-
North Caddo Parish
359 members
-
Cass County, TX
121 members
-
Nacogdoches County
193 members
-
Claiborne Parish
146 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Rapides Parish
101 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
150 members
-
Harrison County
166 members
-
Franklin County, Texas
9 members
© 2025 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
