landowner
john hamilton
  • Male
  • san antonio,tx
  • United States
Share on Facebook

John hamilton's Friends

  • kittycatmama
  • CypressKnees
  • Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
  • blueflame
  • Keith Mauck (Site Publisher)

john hamilton's Groups

john hamilton's Discussions

question regarding deductions on royalty check
5 Replies

Started this discussion. Last reply by 208ef0t5wi05p Jun 18, 2016.

Rodessa Formation
15 Replies

Started this discussion. Last reply by Steverino86 Sep 25, 2015.

Waiting on Completion?

Started Mar 22, 2015

 

john hamilton's Page

Profile Information

How would you describe yourself?
Landowner
Zip Code
78258
Plays that you follow
Haynesville

John hamilton's Blog


landowner

What happened to ELm Grove?

I've been a member of this site since 08 and remember the talk between then and 2010 and

how ELMGrove(S. Caddo) was one of the sweet spots in the play.  Even containing at

one point the largest producing well a few years ago. Since then all of the action appears

to be in De Soto, Red River, and Holly.  Does anyone know what went wrong? Is there

still potential in this area? And if so when? All of my families wells

are in T=16n  R=13w.  We have had at this…

Continue

Posted on July 5, 2012 at 5:34


landowner

tucker 32

we own 62 acres in section 32, 17n-15w. It just produced and shows results for june and july.

With a one fourth agreement with chesapeake. Can someone look at the numbers and tell me what

to expect based on production as listed on sonris?

Posted on October 27, 2010 at 23:07


landowner

drilling related?

Does the shreveport times follow the results published on sonris, or do they have access to well productivity results before they are listed on sonris?

Posted on June 30, 2010 at 20:45 — 1 Comment


landowner

DEBROECK=DEBROKE

I own 125 acres in section 33, 16n 13w and after royalties from the first well on the unit (run by camterra) produced scraps, I recently noticed a second well was being placed on the unit. Can anyone tell me if this is a horizontal well and if so mightl the amount of gas produced be significantly higher than the first.

Posted on February 8, 2010 at 7:30 — 1 Comment


landowner

what to expect?

what might a well located in section 32 17n 15w expect to produce?

Posted on December 16, 2009 at 22:55

Comment Wall (4 comments)

You need to be a member of GoHaynesvilleShale.com to add comments!

Join GoHaynesvilleShale.com

At 15:15 on January 5, 2012,
Oil & Gas ProSkip Peel - Mineral Consultant said…

John, at vertical Pugh clause is triggered at the end of the primary term of the lease.  The standard language releases the rights below the deepest depth drilled or produced plus 100' at the expiration of the primary term.  You are owed royalty on any and all production by EXCO in  a unit including your mineral tract.

At 4:45 on November 22, 2011,
Oil & Gas ProSkip Peel - Mineral Consultant said…

john, if you will give me your email, I will get someone to call you with a counter offer.  Skip

At 2:22 on September 6, 2010,
Oil & Gas ProSkip Peel - Mineral Consultant said…
john, though the well has been potentialed, there is no test report on the well file scout report. When you check the SONRIS Lite well file remember to scroll down below the well scout and look for the well test section. Sometimes the test results are posted before the actual completion data. Good Luck.
At 20:01 on May 24, 2009,
landownerjohn hamilton said…
Hello! I hope the site is a place for to learn, network and contribute. My name is Keith and I started the site in June of 2008 to open up lines of communication between landowners. We now have over 10,000 members.

Check out current discussions at HERE.

Also be sure to follow details on the site HERE.

Have fun SHALING!

Keith "Haynesville"
Site Publisher

P.S. Be sure to check out our BLOGS
 
 
 

© 2026   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service