Hi, Keith.

Sorry to bother you again but I appears that the same spam prob has reared it's ugly head once again. This time they are using the name plovemimi.

Thanks for all you do for us!

Ilona

Keith,

When you were dividing up the EFS into regions I replied that you were leaving Zavala county out.  You still are.  And I can't find the posts that were under Eagleford shale anymore.  Where are they? 

Keith

Changed the profile name to mine.  First one was name of a Family Limited Partnerhip

Sorry, I should have read the comment from Louis befor I sent you the last comment. (and by the way, it is male and female that received them). I got the same msg. from "Peace".

Ilona

Hi Keith

Did you get my comment regarding "Blessing". It looks like several others have a problem with what I believe is an abuse of this incredible resource that you have provided for us.

Thanks,

Ilona

Keith,

I am pretty sure that you have been contacted by someone already, but just in case, I wanted to let you know.  Some freak named "Blessing" is contacting every male on this site with a similar message as this:

Blessing added a comment to your profile on Go Haynesville Shale

------------
Hello My Dear, (blessinbaby23@yahoo.co.uk) How are you today and how is life moving over there? i hope fine. My name is Blessing, It is my pleasure to view your profile today and after going through your profile in (www.gohaynesvilleshale.com) and I became interested in you... please I will like to know you more better... so I will like you to reply this mail with your email address direct to my email not in the site, so that I can give you my picture for you to know whom I am. Here is my email address (blessinbaby23@yahoo.co.uk) believe we can move from here... remember that color or distance does not matter but love matters a lot in life... so I am waiting impatiently to hear from you soonest. Thanks and have a wonderful day from Blessing (blessinbaby23@yahoo.co.uk).

I don't think that is what this site was set up for.

Thanks,

Louis

Dear Keith,

Is cross well development and allocationof production in the best interest of land owner? Swepi/Encana propose that because of Faulting in t13n,r10w,s25,26 , acreage will otherwise may not be developed.  This puts pressure on the land owner to agree to their proposal.

 Here to fore a unitized section evenly divided up production based upon exact

ownership of acreage.

Example of cross unit well development - allocation of production :

1.  total length of lateral est. 6,425' 

2. section  or unit with 4,452' perforated lateral.

3. 4,452/ 6,425' = 69.29%

4. section or unit drilled with perforations 1,973' or 30.71%

 My math (poorly skilled as it is) suggests that proposed 69.29% proposed with cross unit development is considerably less to the land owner.

7,500 ' laterally is forcasted for future drilling.  The more lateral length- the more production.

Perplexed,

la bonne' chance

Thanks so much, Keith. 

Hi Keith,

I hope your new baby is doing well. :)

Have you heard of this movie, Atlas Shrugged? I had not. Here is a very short clip of a review if you want to check it out. I wanted to pass the link on to fellow shalers here in case they hadn't heard of it either.  I just don't know where to post it? It's off topic to natural gas but I don't want it to get buried somewhere. I know a lot of people avoid the combative component in the Politics group, but maybe it should go there?  It just came out recently and I haven't had a chance to go, but I can tell it's significant and so apprapo and fitting with the struggles we are in as a country right now! This is a review  by Cal Thomas.

Keith keep up the good work. We own land in Sikes( Winn and Jackson line.) Are there anything going on  in that area?

Keith,  I read a reply in the Shelby County section from "Alamo" to "Laurie" that really sums up the what, when, where and why of natural gas and a national energy policy.  I think it would be great if The Haynesville Shale website created a plan of  "How America can become energy independent by the increased use of natural gas" and then made it available to all members asking them to distribute it to all of their contacts. 

Keith,

It appears that the RRC is near a decision on the Parker County water well issue.  I would be happy to do a bit of a write up if you think it is of interest to your readers.

http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/meetings/ogpfd/RangePFD.PDF

Dbob