I picked interest on you after going through your short profile and demand it necessary to write you immediately. I have something very important to disclose to you concerning your surname that's to say your last name .since it's a public site.Could you please get back to me on:(timothy.white36@yahoo.com) for more details.
Just dropping by to say hello. Have one "shale" of a day. Also, there some new profile questions. Check those out by clicking HERE. We are also coming up on our 10,000th member. Be sure to celebrate with me. Click HERE for more about that.
Skidmark: what is your take on the Messenger Well and the area surrounding it to the north and north east. I know you've posted on topix as well as Pat, I for one have no idea why the commentators over there have issues when it comes to the status of this well. However, I was hoping if you could lend me your expertise and knowledge on what your thoughts are. My land is to the northeast of the m-well location and there are some productive wells in RRiver to the west of me that is looking favorable however, I do know the importance to our parish as a whole with the Messengers land.
Any updated information you can share would be appreciated as I live out of state.
We are South Park fans also. Now when I am on this site, my son stays interested because he noticed your Mr. Hanky photo. Now he always asks if he can see your photo again. LOL
Regarding the spacing issue I understand where you are coming from. It is still fun to watch Gatorpaw make a complete ass of himself.
When I spoke to Mike Harvey he stressed having a Pugh clause in the lease. The way he explained it to me was that it motivated the E&P to completely drill the unit and not hold it with one well. He explained to me that you can stipulate that if drilling does not progress to the next spaced site within a stipulated period of time you can give a 90 day notice that terminates the lease. His comment was directly pointed to this discussion because he said this prevented the E&P from holding entire units indefinitely with only one well.
Am I misunderstanding this clause? I made a brief comment directed to this and noone responded. I think everyone was having too much fun watching Gatorpaw implode.
Skidmark's Comments
Comment Wall (13 comments)
You need to be a member of GoHaynesvilleShale.com to add comments!
Join GoHaynesvilleShale.com
I picked interest on you after going through your short profile and demand it necessary to write you immediately. I have something very important to disclose to you concerning your surname that's to say your last name .since it's a public site.Could you please get back to me on:(timothy.white36@yahoo.com) for more details.
Regards.
Timothy
thanks
natchn3
Any updated information you can share would be appreciated as I live out of state.
Thanks
natchn3
I found some interesting clauses at the site below referring to continuous drilling. This may be what he is talking about.
http://www.landmen.net/ClausesForms/ClausesForms.htm
Regarding the spacing issue I understand where you are coming from. It is still fun to watch Gatorpaw make a complete ass of himself.
When I spoke to Mike Harvey he stressed having a Pugh clause in the lease. The way he explained it to me was that it motivated the E&P to completely drill the unit and not hold it with one well. He explained to me that you can stipulate that if drilling does not progress to the next spaced site within a stipulated period of time you can give a 90 day notice that terminates the lease. His comment was directly pointed to this discussion because he said this prevented the E&P from holding entire units indefinitely with only one well.
Am I misunderstanding this clause? I made a brief comment directed to this and noone responded. I think everyone was having too much fun watching Gatorpaw implode.
Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Sign Up
or Sign In
Or sign in with:
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Global EV Outlook: IEA
Texas Standard article - Potential lithium boom simmers in East Texas
Texas Smackover Lithium Play
AI boom to fuel natural gas demand in coming years, report says
Arkansas Smackover Lithium Play
Ashland Field Comprehensive Update
SWN wells in King Hill
New technology helps US shale oil industry start to rebuild well productivity
Fourteen Years Ago: The Deepwater Horizon Disaster
Franklin County in the spotlight
Not a member? Get our email.
Weekly Shale Update
View weekly shale archives
Groups
Natchitoches Parish
399 members
Cass County, TX
119 members
Franklin County, Texas
8 members
San Augustine, TX
386 members
Rusk County
97 members
Vernon Parish
59 members
Bienville Parish, LA
242 members
Sabine County, Texas
172 members
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
Angelina County, TX
87 members