Skidmark's Comments

Comment Wall (13 comments)

You need to be a member of GoHaynesvilleShale.com to add comments!

Join GoHaynesvilleShale.com

At 1:41 on February 26, 2019, Timothy White said…
Good day,

I picked interest on you after going through your short profile and demand it necessary to write you immediately. I have something very important to disclose to you concerning your surname that's to say your last name .since it's a public site.Could you please get back to me on:(timothy.white36@yahoo.com) for more details.

Regards.

Timothy
At 11:17 on February 13, 2009, Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) said…
Just dropping by to say hello. Have one "shale" of a day. Also, there some new profile questions. Check those out by clicking HERE. We are also coming up on our 10,000th member. Be sure to celebrate with me. Click HERE for more about that.
At 10:39 on August 24, 2008, Natch N3 said…
skidmark..you need to be checking in on the messenger well these days
At 14:29 on August 5, 2008, Natch N3 said…
Thanks Skidmark..it seems to me this is the best kept secret in Nla!...Any news, i'm certain you'll pass along..
thanks
natchn3
At 12:11 on August 4, 2008, Natch N3 said…
Skidmark: what is your take on the Messenger Well and the area surrounding it to the north and north east. I know you've posted on topix as well as Pat, I for one have no idea why the commentators over there have issues when it comes to the status of this well. However, I was hoping if you could lend me your expertise and knowledge on what your thoughts are. My land is to the northeast of the m-well location and there are some productive wells in RRiver to the west of me that is looking favorable however, I do know the importance to our parish as a whole with the Messengers land.

Any updated information you can share would be appreciated as I live out of state.

Thanks
natchn3
At 16:50 on August 1, 2008, BigSal said…
Not sure what to think about all of this...
At 11:41 on July 30, 2008, Gail's Son-in-LawN1/N2 said…
Skid,

I found some interesting clauses at the site below referring to continuous drilling. This may be what he is talking about.

http://www.landmen.net/ClausesForms/ClausesForms.htm
At 11:05 on July 30, 2008, Gail's Son-in-LawN1/N2 said…
Mike is out of town, but I will ask him if he has a sample the next chance I get.
At 10:08 on July 30, 2008, insomniacnla said…
We are South Park fans also. Now when I am on this site, my son stays interested because he noticed your Mr. Hanky photo. Now he always asks if he can see your photo again. LOL
At 20:02 on July 29, 2008, Gail's Son-in-LawN1/N2 said…
Wouldn't a "continuing operations clause" solve the issue of HBP for an entire unit by only one well?
At 15:12 on July 29, 2008, Gail's Son-in-LawN1/N2 said…
Skid,

Regarding the spacing issue I understand where you are coming from. It is still fun to watch Gatorpaw make a complete ass of himself.

When I spoke to Mike Harvey he stressed having a Pugh clause in the lease. The way he explained it to me was that it motivated the E&P to completely drill the unit and not hold it with one well. He explained to me that you can stipulate that if drilling does not progress to the next spaced site within a stipulated period of time you can give a 90 day notice that terminates the lease. His comment was directly pointed to this discussion because he said this prevented the E&P from holding entire units indefinitely with only one well.

Am I misunderstanding this clause? I made a brief comment directed to this and noone responded. I think everyone was having too much fun watching Gatorpaw implode.
At 18:39 on July 17, 2008, BigSal said…
I still think you are sick in the brain...Flushing, NY.....
At 8:42 on June 27, 2008, Gail's Son-in-LawN1/N2 said…
Have a good flight!

© 2021   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service