Sure, I'm with you. There is nothing stopping a landman from running title, executing, paying, recording in 5 days. If thats the only lease they are taking and they have nothing else to do.
But , the money in this play makes the title requirements greater. The landmen are basically running abstracts to get the money approved from their client. You have to admit, that changes the game some.
Then you have competition. While you're running title, the competition may convince a landowner to take the draft or they may have fewer title requirements for payment and get a check quicker. Then the landmen spent 3 days on a title chain back to patent before he finds out there is nothing to lease there. And very few landowners would keep handshake agreements with money this high. Get burned like that a few times, and it will make you more cautious about running full title on a tract you don't have executed.
I see it from the landowners point of view, but there is alot more risk in this business than the l/o acknowledge sometimes.
My family leased land to Chesapeake in summer of 2007 and we were paid by draft then. We negotiated another deal with Chesapeake this year in May on some other acreage. We signed and received the bank draft the same day. It was a 15 day draft but we were paid a little early. Both times no problem.
That's part of the equation. Do they indeed own the mineral rights? When there is no clear answer based on public record, the research can become quite complicated and time consuming. Prescription as defined in the Mineral Codes requires a search of a minimum of 52 years ownership under the most simple of circumstances and often much longer. Sometimes back to patent. Interpreting when servitudes were created and when they may have expired can be difficult. And mineral production and operations must be documented in addition to title conveyance. It can, and often does, take longer than 3 - 4 days.