Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on December 29, 2009 at 15:52

~4880' due north of the original location.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on December 29, 2009 at 16:01

Kay, the surface location is 150 ft from the south line and 1722 ft from the east line of Section 8. It is odd that the surface location is the same as when the well was the Parker 8 #H1. Also the map does not show any Fulmer lease in Section 8.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by harley on December 30, 2009 at 2:15

Kay, the rig is behind my house. It is on Mr. Boutwell's property. The old Gene Fulmer place.
I did not know if this was the Sec 8 rig or Sec 17 rig. Wonder what prevented them from drilling
on the Parker place? The rig is probaly just about due West of the Parker place across the road in what
once was a pasture but is now about 10 year old planted pines.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by kay53kay T11N,R15W,S8 Desoto on December 30, 2009 at 16:13

Harley, Cheaspeake told me that they had found a fault under our Parker place and that they didn't want to drill there. Seems funny that that would do so much and get all the way down to having the plats, permits and such and then move it... I guess we will realize something out of it since it's still in section 8? CK originally told us they were going to put 4 wells on our place...HA HA Kay

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by harley on December 30, 2009 at 16:39

Kay, they are actually putting another rig down that pipeline by Weeks house also. It is the Trinidad 105. I assumed that it would be on the Parker land but guess not. They have our road in a terrible mess. Not wide enough to meet a car more less an 18-wheeler.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by kay53kay T11N,R15W,S8 Desoto on December 30, 2009 at 17:12

I was just looking at a survey CK sent me showing the proposed site of the Parker surface location and it also shows the proposed surface location for a well just south west of ours in section 17...that must be the Trinidad 105. I hate the road is even worse than it was, we haven't been over there in about a year. I also have an old plat that shows the Fulmer place on it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by harley on December 30, 2009 at 2:18

I said due west of the Parker place but actually a little northwest of that

• ▶ Reply