Does anyone know anything about Campbell #1, John Bryant Survey in Shelby County

I got paperwork from Unit Petroleum that the Campbell #1 is a producing well.  Does anyone know if it really is producing?

Views: 92

Replies to This Discussion

thank you, rj, for your reply. can you tell if 29,292 mcf is a good amount? I am a novice at this. :D
Not huge production at about 1 mmcd average for the month, but nothing to be concerned about as this is a verticle completion.

The good news is that with Chesapeake's new Smith 1-H well recently permitted last week on land that was previously a Burke unit, it looks like there has been some resolution in the Burke/CHK lawsuit and that Chesapeake will now be drilling proper horizontals in those areas.

I would keep an eye on CHK's Smith 1-H, Devon's Adams 1-H and Devon's Whitton 1-H wells which are all permited for that area. Devon's two wells are currently drilling so once the numbers come out (might be a while, however, before they release any production info) on those wells then you will have a pretty good indication as to what prospects you're actually sitting on.
Just to give you an idea where you are at. that Burke/Campbell well is about 1/2 mile directly South of Chesapeake's Smith 1-H well that was just permitted last Friday. It's about 2 miles South of Devon's Adams 1-H which is currently drilling and about 2 miles directly East of Devon's Whitton 1-H which is also currently drilling.

Devon's Warr 1-H is about 5 miles directly East of you and should, hopefully, have some numbers released soon.

Noble's Mary Harris 1-H is about 5 miles directly Southeast of where you are at, and that well had a respectable IP of over 12 mmcfd and has already reported production of almost 800,000 mcf of gas in less than 1 year of reported production.

Now that it looks like CHK will come in an properly drill horizontals in these units held by Burke, it should turn out to be a decent place to have some mineral holdings.

Good luck to you.
I talked with a person in the know (I am new to this so I better not name names) that told me that a couple of the Unit Petroleum wells were being looked at by Chesapeake for horizontal drilling mine may one of them (Bush)
I beliwve the Campbell is the other.
This is great news indeed!
Would Chesapeake allow the vertical well to produce while waitning to drill the horizontal or would the well (Bush) be shut-in? It would be nice for the mineral owners if they could "double-dip"! I also noticed that this well is unitized for 483.015 acreas. Nice for the mineral owners if it stayed this size!
Depending upon their lease-hold position in that specific area, I would imagine that CHK would likely push the unit size up to the allowable limits of around 700 acres once they do move forward with plans for the horizontal. I.e. - just yesterday, Devon re-permitted their War 1-H well that is now completing. Originally unit size was around 360 acres and the amended unit is now at 766 acres. They must have recieved a special variance on that well, however, as the current statewide regulations allow for unit sizes of 640acres + 10% = 704 acres.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service