Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 22, 2010 at 12:08

Coonman. There hasn't been an application or order for townships 20 and 19N in a long time. Devon's in 20N -14W were heard Jan 26, 2010. But before that we must go back to a single unit by Endeavor in S26 - 19N -11W on Oct. 20, 2009. Those may not seem like long ago but keep in mind that the public hearing schedule is currently published through April 6, 2010. I just don't see much of anything happening in north Caddo and Bossier parishes. And I do not expect to see any HA related activity until nat gas prices improve significantly. I am hoping that we will hear something encouraging in the near future in regard to Devon's units which, IMO, are more likely to be CV or SMK wells.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Coonman on February 23, 2010 at 2:42

Just accross the Stateline there is alot of activity 2 miles west and north and south.. I wish somone could tell us more about the Texas activity for this area..

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by J W on February 22, 2010 at 14:21

what about sec.33 near cross lake ? its south of the lake we signed about 18 month ago.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 22, 2010 at 14:32

JW, I think you may be referring to Section 33 - 18N - 14W as it is south of Cross Lake. Encana formed a HA Unit that combined Section 33 and part of Section 28 which is located under the lake. There has been no well permitted for that unit.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 22, 2010 at 17:54

Skip, take a look at the attached grid.

Attachments:

• Haynesville Unit Grid 2-22-10.pdf, 51 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Linda Blunt on February 23, 2010 at 6:08

Les,
This is a great map! Thanks!! :)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on February 23, 2010 at 14:16

Les,

I don't know if this color scheme works for me.

I look much better in pink than in yellow. Instead of you changing it, why don't you just put in a word to the oil and gas companies to increase their unitizations.

If they increase it enough I won't even mind wearing blue instead of pink.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Belmont Boy on February 22, 2010 at 18:27

Les B: Thanks for clean, clear presentation of units. What do the different colors represent?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on February 22, 2010 at 19:33

BB,

Yellow/Tan - 1 to 29 units in a Township-Range
Light Red - 30 to 35 units in a Township-Range
Blue - 36 units in a Township-Range which means fully unitized

I underlined the 30 in T15N-R16W because that is all the sections in that particular Township-Range.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 23, 2010 at 3:15

Thanks, Les. I was thinking about a color code that would recognize not just the number of units formed by township but a means to indicate where current unitization is occurring. For example, a color for those townships with more than X number of units in the last 30 days. Those with less than X in the last 30 days. Those with none in the last 30 days. Those with none in the last 60 days, etc. All those that have reached full unitization would be a base color. In other words, a means to indicate the level and location of unitization activity at the time of the Snapshot.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by J W on February 23, 2010 at 14:09

skip i live in sec 33 15n 18w jolly napier thanks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on February 23, 2010 at 14:17

JW. I am familiar with Jolly Napier Road. Isn't it in 18N - 15W? As you are in Section 33, you are in the Greenwood-Waskom Field which has a healthy amount of on-going development activity by Petrohawk and Chesapeake. At current nat gas prices and the pace of development, you may have to wait a year or so but you should be okay. Good Luck.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page