Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on October 13, 2010 at 9:15

John, the following are the Haynesville Units in T14N-R8W and there have been no permitted wells in the township. Because Section 32 has been unitized it is difficult to assess who may have the largest leasehold.

S18-T14N-R8W, HA RA SUB Unit, EnCana, Madden Branch Field, Red River Parish
S19-T14N-R8W, HA RA SUC Unit, EnCana, Madden Branch Field, Red River Parish
S20-T14N-R8W, HA RA SUD Unit, EnCana, Madden Branch Field, Red River Parish
S29-T14N-R8W, HA RA SUE Unit, EnCana, Madden Branch Field, Red River Parish
S30-T14N-R8W, HA RA SUF Unit, EnCana, Madden Branch Field, Red River Parish
S31-T14N-R8W, HA RA SUDD Unit, Samson, Martin Field, Red River Parish

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by John Moore on October 14, 2010 at 0:07

Thanks as always Les, I was curious about the unitization. What does this mean for my area as opposed to a non unitized section? Appreciate your wisdom on the matter :)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on October 14, 2010 at 2:58

John, sorry but I left out a critical word in my previous statement. I meant to say "Because Section 32 has not been unitized it is difficult to assess who may have the largest leasehold."

Typically a section is unitized for the Haynesville formation before a Haynesville Shale well is proposed. So unitization is a positive sign but does not guarantee a well will be permitted and drilled. Also, once a section is unitized it identifies which company will drill wells in that section and is normally the largest acreage holder in the section.

• ▶ Reply