Driller denies that it contaminated Texas aquifer - EPA Makes Aggressive Move

Posted as an FYI:

Driller denies that it contaminated Texas aquifer


By RAMIT PLUSHNICK-MASTI Associated Press © 2010 The Associated Press

Dec. 7, 2010, 8:44PM

HOUSTON — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued an emergency order against a Texas gas driller Tuesday, accusing the company of contaminating an aquifer and giving it 48 hours to provide clean drinking water to affected residents and begin taking steps to resolve the problem.
 

The order is unprecedented in Texas, partly because the federal body overstepped the state agency responsible for overseeing gas and oil drilling in the state. The EPA's move could ratchet up a bitter fight between Texas and the EPA that has evolved in the past year from a dispute over environmental issues into a pitched battle over states rights.

 

EPA regional director Al Armendariz said he issued the order against Range Resources of Fort Worth, Texas, because he felt the Texas Railroad Commission was not responding quickly enough to contamination found in two water wells belonging to Parker County residents in North Texas.

The EPA began inspecting the wells in August after receiving complaints from residents who said the Texas commission and Range Resources had not responded to problems they were having with their drinking water. The EPA inspected the wells with the commission, Armendariz said, and found high levels of explosive methane, as well as other contaminants, including cancer-causing benzene.

"We thought what we found in the homes was alarming," Armendariz told The Associated Press.

Range Resources on Tuesday denied being the source of the contamination.

 

"We've been working with the Railroad Commission as well as the landowners over the last several months," spokesman Matt Pitzarella said. "We believe that the methane in the water has absolutely no connection to our operations in the area. We provided that information to the Railroad Commission, the landowners and to the EPA." The Railroad Commission issued a statement saying members of its staff also have not reached conclusions about the source of the contamination. It said Range Resources is cooperating with the commission's investigation and already had agreed last week to conduct more tests, as well as to perform soil gas surveys, monitor gas concentrations, and offer a water supply to affected residents.

 

"If the data indicates oil field activities are responsible for the gas found in the water well, the (commission) will require assessment, cleanup, and evaluate what fines or penalties may be
assessed as necessary," the statement said. But John Blevins, the director of the EPA's compliance assurance and enforcement division, wrote in a letter Tuesday to Range Resources that the contamination findings present "a potential imminent endangerment to the health of persons using those private drinking water wells."

 

The EPA gave Range Resources 24 hours to inform the agency in writing that it will comply with the federal order. It then had 48 hours to provide impacted families with clean drinking water and install
monitors in the homes to ensure methane gas levels don't rise to explosive levels. The company was given five days to begin a thorough survey of the aquifer to determine if other wells and families also could be impacted by contamination.

 

Range Resources has been using new technologies that make it possible to extract once out-of-reach natural gas reserves. Horizontal drilling, along with the hydraulic fracturing, make it possible for drillers to permeate once impenetrable geologic formations called shale. The companies pump high volumes of water and chemicals at great pressure into the well bore to permeate the rock, and
there have been complaints in some places — especially in Pennsylvania — that underground aquifers have been contaminated in the process.

 

This is the first such suspicion in Texas, Armendariz said. The families in Parker County have not been identified, but Armendariz said they had been using the wells for years and never had issues until Range began drilling nearby in April 2009. One of the greatest fears is of explosion, he said.

The EPA issued the emergency order under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Texas Railroad commissioner Michael L. Williams called it "Washington politics of the worst kind."

 

"The EPA's act is nothing more than grandstanding in an effort to interject the federal government into Texas business," he said.

___

Associated Press writer Terry Wallace in Dallas contributed to this report.



Tags: contamination, drilling, epa, texas

Views: 879

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Get rid of the EPA, get big government off the backs of all Americans, they will soon be in our houses telling us what to do with our free time.
is it not just a little odd that where hydraulic fracing of shale formations occurs, ground water pollution follows?....colorado, wyoming, pennsylvania, and now texas. it reminds me of the saying, "it's stupid to do the same thing over and over and expect different results." ground water pollution by hydraulic fracturing is another example of greediness of a few people to make money on the backs of other people and with total disregard to to the well being of others. these people are no different than those that made billions thru unethical, shady and illegal financial instruments that hurt millions of people to the benefit of a relative few. the perpetrators of the financial meltdown all denied culpability of course just like the halliburtons, et al, are doing with hydraulic fracturing. BP's lust for profit and lack of ethical behavior is a more recent example of a disaster caused by a lack of oversight. it is very sad that companies/organizations have to be monitored and regulated to prevent abusive practices but greed and accumulation of money is evidently so powerful and addivtive that those seeking wealth will do so at any cost to others. the geologist/engineers involved in the shale operations are intelligent/knowledgable professionals..of couse they know there is a problem with ground water pollution but they rationalize their work in ways that benefit the hand that feeds them just as the chemist working for big tobacco did when they went before congress in the early 60's and declared that smoking had no harmful side affects. water is necessary for life on planet earth, oil and gas are not. water is our most valued and necessary resource and it should be protected at all cost. i suspect that eventually it will be determined that the current method hydraulic fracturing of the shale formations does indeed pollute ground water, but it will be too late. the damage will have been done; however, there will be some people with mucho dinero and many who will have to go find drinkable water every day.
Jimmy, The practice of oil field fracing has been going on in the oil patch for over fifty years. It would be wise to check this out before you call people greedy, stupid , or any other names uttered in your comments. if people like you have thier way we will all be riding on two wheels instead of four, and a lot of the world population will strave to death. My advise, think a lot before you speak about something you know nothing about.

Terry, what FREE TIME??  They may have us all moonlighting, working to the point there shall be no more free time.  I have been that way most of my life.  LOL and COL

the circumnavigation of congress by executive fiat continues apace.
EPA Tussle With Texas Regulators Spreads to Gas Wells

by Kate Galbraith
December 7, 2010

Armendariz effectively stepped in above the Texas Railroad Commission, which had been looking into the incident but so far had not acted. Concerns raised by one homeowner "were not adequately addressed by the State or the company," the EPA said.

In a release this evening, the Railroad Commission fired back. Victor Carrillo, the commission's outgoing chairman, called the EPA's actions "premature," because a Railroad Commission investigation, which began in August, is ongoing.

The two other commissioners jumped in too. "This is Washington politics of the worst kind," said Commissioner Michael Williams, sounding a note familiar in ongoing Texas-EPA sparring matches over air-pollution permitting. "The EPA's act is nothing more than grandstanding in an effort to interject the federal government into Texas business."

Elizabeth Ames Jones, the third commissioner, also descried the EPA move as "premature," and denounced "false claims made against our investigative actions by the EPA staff."


http://www.texastribune.org/texas-state-agencies/texas-railroad-com...
Does anyone else find it unusual that this has been in the news so much lately? 60 minutes, MSNBC, and even my local paper in Tennessee.
What is their angle?
I also read that the EPA did a study in 2004 that found that fracing did not contaminate water if done correctly. Are they retracting their own study now?
GASP!!! You mean ... NO!! As in fair, young Bonny who had her coming out party, all decked in green, with suitors from afar who would go above & beyond what had to be done to make sure her debut would be a success??? Could it be possible that a few of those suitors courted others in similar fashion on their home soils? Oh, what scoundrels those gents can be when dallying with the affections of innocents like Bonny and all in the name of alligiance to country.

80)
Everybody is quick to blame hydraulic fracturing for water contamination, when most likely it is simply incorrectly set and cemented casing. Guess it really doesn't matter the cause, it all falls back on the operator being responsible, and in this case Range is claiming it is not at fault. Now where does this leave the people with contaminated water wells?
So, FXEF, what's your best guess as to where the benzene and other contaminants came from? Range didn't cover that in their statement, at least not in this article.

80)
sesport,

The contaminants are most likely coming from the the well due to faulty casing, not from hydraulic fracture. Each well is unique and produces many different kinds of hydrocarbons naturally and bad casing will allow them to enter the ground water. Range is not going to admit to anything, they are going to keep as low a profile as possible. They are probably at fault, but will never admit it.
Why does anyone think that an EPA regulator is more qualified or trustworthy that the State regulators?????????? How did that work out for the financial regulators? They did a fine job(insert sarcasm here).
Here's a quote by the company and the State: But the company and the Texas regulators shot back that their investigations, ongoing since August, have failed to show any link between the drilling and water contamination. Range said the well water in the area has long contained methane. Texas officials accused EPA of grandstanding and making "false claims" about its actions.

"If this is another EPA action designed to reach predetermined conclusions and to generate headlines rather than conduct a successful environmental investigation, then the public is poorly served," TRC member Elizabeth Ames Jones said. "The commission will not deny due process to the parties involved in spite of the false claims made against our investigative actions by the EPA staff."

Range said in a statement, "It's very clear that our activities have not had any impact on the water aquifer."

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service