Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on July 25, 2011 at 6:39

CeeTee, it's not a Haynesville well so try not to compare it to results from HA shale.  It is still not clear which formation they are producing from (wildcat) but the IP was 1.25 MMcfd of NG and if you look at the G-5 report, it also produced 45 bbls of condensate.  The reported pressure is low (90# FTP) and the choke is wide open.

It will be interesting to see which field the well is assigned to.

 

Production

March: 5,979 mcf gas; 1,486 bbl condensate

April:   7,117 mcf gas; 1,146 bbl condensate

May:   19,019 mcf gas;   852 bbl condensate

 

Completion Packet: http://webapps.rrc.state.tx.us/CMPL/publicSearchAction.do?packetSum...

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Johnnie Joe on July 25, 2011 at 7:01

I'm guessing it has a compressor on it since it shows sells going to TPF which I think is a higher pressure gathering system than this well seems to be?  Might explain the gas volumes going up too?

landownerPermalink Reply by Coffee55 on July 25, 2011 at 7:20

Yes, that is correct. I stopped by the site a couple of months ago when passing through the area to see if any of the onsite personnel could tell me anything. In fact there are 2 large compressors along with what could best be described as a 'mini' refinery.

landownerPermalink Reply by Coffee55 on July 25, 2011 at 7:42

Thanks for you helpful reply jffreel. Does the L-1 Header form tell you anything as to the possible formation?

 

Driller depth:                                  8962 ft.

Schlumberger depth:                      8446 ft.

Bottom log interval:                        8438 ft.

Top log interval:                             3270 ft.

 

Thanks again......

Permalink Reply by jffree1 on July 26, 2011 at 4:21

There isn't much formation record in that area to compare to.  Some of us have speculated that it might be James Lime.