Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on November 7, 2008 at 3:33

You are calling this well a vertical Haynesville and you may be right, but it looks like a horizontal Haynesville with a short lateral to me. I've asked my friend, Jay, to clarify the matter . I agree with you, though, the DST looks good at this point.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on November 7, 2008 at 3:42

My friend, Jay, says you are right and I am wrong. It is a vertical Haynesville and a good one at that.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on November 7, 2008 at 4:02

SB, yes this was a vertical well drilled to 14,100' TD

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TruckNutz on November 7, 2008 at 3:50

Could someone explain the test results in layman's terms? TIA

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on November 7, 2008 at 4:07

TN, the test results are as follows:

Gas Flow Rate - 4,790 thousand cubic feet per day (Mcfd)
Water Flow Rate - 100 Bbls per day
Flowing Pressure - 3600 psi
Choke Size - 14/64"
Perforated Interval - 13346' to 13817'

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner on November 7, 2008 at 17:44

Les B, have you seen the log on this well?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on November 8, 2008 at 5:10

SB, no but I think Jay (ShaleGeo) has.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Father of the Year on November 8, 2008 at 7:46

Would love for someone to obtain the shale thickness info from Jay or someone else and post it on this thread.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BirdDawg, plain ole' idiot on November 8, 2008 at 11:08

I think Jay posted this info some time back. I can't remember the details, but he said it looked favorable.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on November 8, 2008 at 18:27

FOTY, Jay had previously stated the net thickness was similar to the Red River Parish wells. That should be ~ 150 ft.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Grice on November 8, 2008 at 16:13

While I was trying to learn "Well Log Reading 101" from Jay, I am not confident enough to give a definite interpretation. However, for those who are more familiar with well logs, maybe they can give more detail.

Here is a image file of deeper depth of the Paul E Messenger well.

http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/5972/mercercompressedew7.jpg

• ▶ Reply