ByBrian Stoffel, The Motley Fool Posted 9:55PM 02/06/12
There's an energy revolution taking place, and the pace of the revolution is accelerating. It's entirely possible that the way our world is powered 10 years from now will be vastly different from the way it's powered today.
As our energy expert Travis Hoium has pointed out, the price of natural gas is rigged to stay low for the foreseeable future. That's bad news for natural gas extractors.
Just last month,Chesapeake Energy (NYS:CHK) , one of the country's largest natural gas players, announced that it will cut back on production. By doing so, it's hoping to minimize the supply glut that's plunged prices to record lows.
But one sector's pain is often another's gain, and that's certainly the case right now. With the cost of natural gas falling and the price of oil rising, the financial incentive to develop machines that can run solely on natural gas has increased exponentially.
That's great news for a couple of companies that made some huge announcements last week. All of these companies stand to benefit from a conversion from petroleum-based fuel to natural gas.
First announcement: Feb. 1
Last Wednesday,Navistar (NYS:NAV) CEO Dan Houston appeared on CNBC'sSquawk Box with Clean Energy Fuels (NAS:CLNE) board member and energy guru T. Boone Pickens. Navistar is an international trucking company, while Clean Energy is focused on building out the infrastructure of natural gas filling stations in North America.
The two announced a partnership whose goal is to "provide customers with a sustainable, commercially viable solution for adding natural gas-powered trucks to their fleets." In other words, Navistar wants to start pumping out natural gas trucks, and Clean Energy is going to help it get there.
Citing incredible demand for such trucks, Houston said he hoped to ramp up production and start offering them up in as little as six months. Pickens was quick to point out that the switchover would have three huge advantages over standard diesel trucks: Natural gas is $1.50 per gallon cheaper -- and 30% cleaner -- than petroleum-based fuel, and it doesn't have to be sourced from the Middle East.
Time will tell whether this partnership is able to bear fruit as quickly as they claim, but such confidence is a clear indicator that the financial benefits of natural gas are at a tipping point.
Second announcement: Feb. 3
While many may have cheered the Navistar/Clean Energy partnership, investors in Westport Innovations (NAS:WPRT) weren't happy at all. Before Wednesday, shareholders of Westport felt safe knowing their company was one of the few that had been able to engineer a practical engine that could run solely on natural gas.
With Navistar's announcement, it seemed like other industry players were going to be ganging up and moving in on their turf, and fast. The market took notice and sent Westport's shares plunging on Thursday afternoon.
But after the market closed on Friday, the story got interesting. Instead of developing its own natural gas engines, Navistar announced that it "will offer the Cummins Westport ISL G [engine] in the International TranStar and WorkStar trucks."
In other words, Navistar's not developing a new engine at all. It'll be offering the engines that Westport engineers and Cummins (NYS:CMI) manufactures -- as part of the Cummins Westport partnership -- in its trucking fleet.
What it all means
As I said, it remains to be seen exactly how this will all pan out, but this news is certainly a boon for all four companies involved.
If demand really is as high as Houston made it sound, that could mean a lot of new purchases for Navistar. New purchases for Navistar necessarily equates to a steep increase in engine orders for Cummins and Westport. It also means that there will undoubtedly be more natural gas trucks out on the road that rely on Clean Energy's fueling stations to help them move their products from coast to coast.
Tags: Chesapeake, Clean Energy Fuels, Cummins, Dan Houston, Natural Gas, Navistar, T. Boone Pickens, Westport Innovations
The sad thing is, its pretty simple, and I expect it to actually be cleaner than gasoline, but the "permitted" or "legal" conversions are a lot more expensive.
As an aside, you are probably ok using this on an off road vehicle that doesn't operate on public roads or land.
I am personally OK with the use of CNG but as stated in an earlier post here I witnessed a local company with a FLEET of trucks abandon it when they had FREE GAS and a $45K dollar compressor station in place in the mid 90's ----- they were ordering their GM vehicles CNG equipped straight from the factory and I saw several of them sitting on the dealers lot in Madisonville waiting on prep/ delivery.
So this brings up the the WHY question would they quit ------ must have had something to do with insurance and the perception of a hazardous material being hauled/handled ? ------ I have witnessed a few fires that consumed bottled flammable gas and the result was EXPLOSIVELY unpredictable. ------ Also have noted in the last few years Farmers and other construction pick-up truck drivers being ticketed for carrying more than 100 gals of diesel fuel without a hazardous materials drivers license. FYI --- many large farm tractors today carry 100 to 300 gals of fuel.
57 states! Remember?
You do not need to have an EPA approved conversion kit. It is not illegal to install a non EPA approved kit.
This is a big myth by the EPA kit installers.
See our FAQ page for more information
No, and you are not required to have an EPA approved conversion kit installed on your car. The EPA only regulators manufacturers. They do not regulate installers or individuals. Most conversion kits installed throughout the USA are not EPA approved conversion kits and are being installed throughout the USA without anyone having problems from the EPA. It is the installers of EPA approved kits that do not want you to install a non EPA approved conversion kit on your car and they are trying to frighten the consumer from installing them.
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
386 members
27 members
455 members
440 members
400 members
244 members
149 members
358 members
63 members
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutAs exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoHaynesvilleShale.com