Replies to This Discussion

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Todd Hackney on February 27, 2013 at 2:52

Some related information:

EPA Announces Final Rulemaking for Clean Alternative Fuel Vehicle and Engine Conversions

http://epa.gov/otaq/consumer/fuels/altfuels/documents/420f12058.pdf

Natural Gas Vehicle Conversions

http://www.afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/natural_gas_conversions.html

Available NGV Aftermarket Conversion Systems

http://www.ngvamerica.org/pdfs/Available_Vehicles_and_Engines.pdf

Louisiana Truck Outfitters

http://cngoutfitters.com/dealers/louisiana

Convert to CNG with Steelweld

http://www.steelweld.net/products/cng_conversions

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by Ghawker on February 27, 2013 at 4:39

Great to see that the EPA has eliminated the annual recertification requirement--in my opinion, this is the singlemost onerous regulation that has kept conversions from being cost-effective.

• ▶ Reply

Oil & Gas ProPermalink Reply by CNG South on March 5, 2013 at 11:40

A dual fuel conversion on a diesel will not see quite the savings as a bi-fuel or dedicated CNG conversion on a gasoline vehicle. It is more of a power performance product which will increase horse power & mpg. You will not likely find an EPA certified kit for this as well. The increased torque & HP is certainly enjoyable.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Acadiana CNG on November 17, 2014 at 13:38

Ron,

Our company Acadiana CNG, specializes primarily in diesel CNG applications. We have done several trucks. For additional information go to our website, www.acadianacng.com   We are located in New Iberia, Louisiana. Hope to hear from you

Acadiana CNG

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DTrucks on November 17, 2014 at 23:59

Back in the day, 1980s, the kit consisted of nothing more than a square flange that that you placed between the carb and intake. Had to start the engine on liquid fuel, and then switch to gas once you were moving. Looked like nothing more than an old propane stove burner with the holes in the center doughnut hole.  

• ▶ Reply