Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by olddog573 on June 19, 2014 at 7:39

yeah your right but this is the second hosston.  1st being section 15.  I've found the discussion you started.  will start following that one.

Permalink Reply by Penrod-63 on June 12, 2014 at 10:31

Any news on new leasing activity on expired leases that is ongoing in the NE Sabine and NW Natchitoches Parish areas?

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on June 12, 2014 at 10:46

John, I don't know of any current interest or lease offers in that general area.

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on June 19, 2014 at 7:45

Correct, olddog.  Please make a reply or bump that other discussion thread so that it will be at the top of the group discussions with this one.

Permalink Reply by Penrod-63 on May 30, 2015 at 14:34

Skip,

I see that the XTO Powell #1 and Blankenship #! have been re-completed in the Hosston formation. is there any news on the outcome of the re-completion?

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on May 30, 2015 at 14:56

John, where do you see a report of the re-completion of those wells in the Hosston?

Permalink Reply by Penrod-63 on May 31, 2015 at 5:25

Visited the locations. Wellheads have been replaced with smaller trees. Assuming the re-completions have occurred, I would know no other reason why they would be replaced other than for corrosion or some other mechanical reason. Just curious. I do own property in The Blankenship Unit. I live out of state and was visiting there last week.

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on May 31, 2015 at 5:55

A re-completion would be reported in the state database.  Since there is no report I suspect that there was some sort of work over performed.  It is possible that the Powell well was  re-fracked as multiple Haynesville operators have been testing that technology.  The production history shows  zero production in Sept, '14, modest production in Oct. which may be a partial month of production and a significant increase in Nov. and thereafter.  That is similar to the production history we have seen on wells we know have been re-fracked.  The Blandenship reported zero in April and the production has severely declined so it may be next if just to revive production enough to hold the leases. 

LEASE\UNIT\WELL PRODUCTION

RPT DATE	LUW CODE			WELL CNT	OPENING STK	OIL PROD(BBL)	GAS PROD(MCF)
04/01/2015	617417			1	0	0	64460
03/01/2015	617417			1	0	0	67515
02/01/2015	617417			1	0	0	62327
01/01/2015	617417			1	0	0	72069
12/01/2014	617417			1	0	0	66108
11/01/2014	617417			1	0	0	41591
10/01/2014	617417			1	0	0	10404
09/01/2014	617417			1	0	0	0
08/01/2014	617417			1	0	0	849
07/01/2014	617417			1	0	0	411
06/01/2014	617417			1	0	0	659
05/01/2014	617417			1	0	0	959
04/01/2014	617417			1	0	0	647
03/01/2014	617417			1	0	0	976
02/01/2014	617417			1	0	0	927
01/01/2014	617417			1	0	0	968
12/01/2013	617417			1	0	0	1175
11/01/2013	617417			1	0	0	960
10/01/2013	617417			1	0	0	1008
09/01/2013	617417			1	0	0	1284
08/01/2013	617417			1	0	0	1301
07/01/2013	617417			1	0	0	1432
06/01/2013	617417			1	0	0	1660
05/01/2013	617417			1	0	0	1851
04/01/2013	617417			1	0	0	2075
03/01/2013	617417			1	0	0	2435
02/01/2013	617417			1	0	0	1578
01/01/2013	617417			1	0	0	3220
12/01/2012	617417			1	0	0	4033
11/01/2012	617417			1	0	0	4237
10/01/2012	617417			1	0	0	5499
09/01/2012	617417			1	0	0	6435
08/01/2012	617417			1	0	0	8461
07/01/2012	617417			1	0	0	11076
06/01/2012	617417			1	0	0	15190
05/01/2012	617417			1	0	0	46097
04/01/2012	617417			1	0	0	29996

Permalink Reply by Penrod-63 on July 15, 2015 at 1:53

This is the latest posting in Sonris Lite for the Powell 15  H San Miguel Creek Field, Natchitoches Parish

07/06/2015

12

15060

RECOMPLETED - GAS - 10/21/14 - HOSS - 2043 MCFD; 12/64 CHOKE; 3285 FP; PERF 7864-7874

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on July 15, 2015 at 2:07

Thanks for the notice, Penrod.  Here is a link to the new Allowable Report.  I was hoping for wet gas but it looks dry.  XTO paid a pretty price for jumping into the H Shale frenzy late and that far south.  Re-completing their HA wells in shallower formations will allow them to maintain their leasehold for future possibilities.

http://ucmwww.dnr.state.la.us/ucmsearch/UCMRedir.aspx?url=http%3a%2...

Permalink Reply by George Willey on July 23, 2015 at 2:32

Skip,

Are these production levels encouraging for potential future Hosston wells in this area or do you believe that this is simply being completed by XTO to hold production in leased sections?  Also, do they access this formation through horizontal or vertical drilling?

Permalink Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant on July 23, 2015 at 3:25

This is a vertical completion from a very narrow depth range of 10'.  I'm not a completion or reservoir engineer but this looks like an effort to spend as little as possible to establish production and to hold the dearly bought leases.

If 10' is indeed the full interval deemed to be productive then a horizontal well would be a waste of money.  If there were zones that looked better over the entire vertical depth of the well I would have expected a re-completion in some other zone..  If that's an accurate assumption then there is nothing better than the Hosston Formation.  I was hoping for a James Lime completion.

PERFORATED INTERVAL

FROM                   TO

7864                     7874

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page