Excerpt:  "Standard Lithium Ltd. (“Standard Lithium” or the “Company”) (TSXV: SLI) (NYSE American: SLI) (FRA: S5L), a leading near-commercial lithium company, is pleased to announce that, as part of its significant resource expansion work in the East Texas Smackover region, it has sampled, to the best of its knowledge, the highest confirmed lithium grade brine in North America, with a grade of 634 mg/L lithium. In Standard Lithium’s experience, the grade of lithium in brine used for Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) has a meaningful impact on both capital expenditures and operating costs in connection with the extraction process, with a higher grade typically resulting in lower overall costs.

https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/11004817901?pro...

Views: 15709

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Would a horizontal brine completion make sense?

Lateral drilled in good Smackover reservoir should yield major fluid / water flow volumes.

Might help solve the volume requirement.

More fluid with lower Lithium content may work if volumes can be handled effectively.

Investment dollars will flow to areas that have economic concentrations and water volumes.  Upping the flow rates may make some areas of lower concentrations more attractive.  Seems like a lot of interest, and money, searching for an opportunity to invest in direct lithium extraction (DLE).  I'd like to see a horizontal test in Cass County.

Australian companies take interest in South Arkansas' lithium potential

Daytona Lithium

Daytona Lithium is securing brine leases in central and western Lafayette County.


G’day, Lafayette County. There are new players in brine leasing across the Smackover Formation, adding an international dimension to the search for lithium under South Arkansas’ billabongs.

Australian-based Daytona Lithium, a private partnership, controls the brine leases to 5,325 acres abutting ExxonMobil’s newly-acquired brine leases. Daytona’s leases are in central and western Lafayette County toward the Red River.

Daytona also has additional lease offers out to mineral owners in an effort to expand its acreage lease base.

The news came late last week in an announcement by another Australian company, publicly-owned Pantera Minerals. Pantera, headquartered in Perth, said it has purchased a 35 percent interest in Daytona Lithium through a $2 million (Australian dollars) convertible note.

Pantera Minerals’ announcement noted the interest in the lithium-rich brine contained within the Smackover Formation from companies includes ExxonMobil, Albemarle, Tetra Technologies and Standard Lithium.

“The Smackover Formation is considered to be one of the significant lithium regions globally,” Pantera’s announcement said, outlining Daytona Lithium plans for its “Superbird Project.”

“Daytona will continue its aggressive acreage leasing strategy funded by the $2 million investment from Pantera. The 35% project interest is secured via a $2 million convertible note facility into Daytona, supported by a two-tranche placement of 28,571,429 shares at 7 cents per share to raise the $2 million to fund the convertible note facility,” Pantera said.

“Understanding of the mineral ownership is the key element of obtaining lithium brine leases, Daytona has entered into an exclusive agreement with a commercial leasing abstract company, the only such provider for the area of interest, to provide a further 50,000 acres of lease abstract services, an essential service in the lease acquisition process where lithium brine owners rights are accurately identified. This arrangement allows Daytona to quickly make leasing offers to mineral owners -- a key commercial advantage,” said the Pantera statement.

Work is under way to generate a lithium exploration target from the geological and petrophysical data that is available from historical oil and gas exploration and production previously conducted within the Daytona controlled leased acreage.

Daytona will secure brine samples for further analysis and pilot plant direct lithium extraction (DLE) testing.

“With Pantera’s 35% investment into Daytona Lithium, the company enters one of the most significant and emerging brine plays in the USA. Daytona holds highly prospective lithium brine leases in the Smackover Play located in Arkansas,” said Matt Hansen, Pantera’s chief executive officer.

“Daytona’s project area directly abuts Exxon’s Smackover Lithium Brine Project, Standard Lithium’s Lanxess and South West Arkansas Project and Albemarle Corporation's Lithium-Bromine Brine Project. Confirming the Smackover’s Tier 1 lithium brine status was Exxon’s entrance into the region, marked by a reported $100 million (U.S.) acquisition of over 100,000 acres of private leases and their subsequent agreement with Tetra Technologies Inc.. to develop a further 6,000 lithium-rich acres in Arkansas to produce 75,000-100,000 metric tons annually, equaling 15% of the world's lithium production last year.

“The Smackover Play is fast becoming recognized as a leading play globally for lithium brine production with a long-established bromine brine extraction industry and a hundred years of oil and gas well data available. We look forward to working with the Daytona team with the aim of increasing the leased area and generating a lithium exploration target in the short term and creating value by providing shareholders with exploration exposure to this exciting battery metals project,” Hansen said.

The Pantera statement said that Daytona’s Superbird Project covers a land position of 5,325 leased acres of lithium brine prospective ground, with a further 7,000 acres under negotiation. Daytona is also considering a second target area for leasing up to 50,000 acres will continue to increase its land position and Pantera looks forward to updating shareholders with increased project acreage.

“Daytona has entered into an exclusive agreement with a commercial abstract company, being the only company that provides the mineral ownership abstract information for the Project Area. Importantly, understanding of the mineral ownership is the key element of obtaining lithium brine leases,” the Pantera statement said.

“This is a key commercial advantage to Daytona providing the company with mineral ownership records confirming the mineral owners and ensuring that leases entered into are with the correct mineral owners (mineral rights can be severed from surface rights in the USA and records dating back to the 1800’s must be examined to ensure correct mineral right ownership).

“The exclusive agreement is for a term of 6 months and contains an option to extend for a further two 6-month terms. This provides a key advantage in that Daytona will be able to acquire the required accurate mineral ownership information from the project area more quickly than its competitors.

“Although this information can be obtained from public records, it is a timely and (labor-intensive) process,” the Pantera statement said.

(This article was the result of a tip from a magnoliareporter.com reader.)

Arkansas could be the Future of US Lithium Production

August 28th, 2023 | Written by Peter Frerichs www.globaltrademag.com

Exxon Mobile is bullish on Arkansas. But neither oil nor gas is a driving factor. The southwest region of Arkansas is rich in saltwater brine. Once a thorn in the side of oil companies, saltwater brine is now highly sought-after principally due to what can be extracted from it – lithium. 

When a lithium-rich brine aquifer is discovered, the salty water is pumped to the surface (roughly 8,000 feet) where the lithium is then separated from the brine. This results in a lithium concentrate solution that is crystalized into lithium hydroxide, a battery-grade product for electric vehicle batteries. In May Exxon Mobile purchased 120,000 gross acres in southwest Arkansas for north of $100 million. The Texas giant is now rumored to be constructing one of the world’s largest lithium processing facilities close to Magnolia, a town of just 12,000 inhabitants. The facility would have the capacity to produce up to 100,000 metric tons of lithium per year, the equivalent of approximately 15% of the finished lithium produced globally last year. 

The Permian Basin of West Texas and New Mexico was a boon for US oil. Some are positing that Southwest Arkansas has the potential to be even more favorable in terms of the expected lithium output. In general, drilling for lithium is cleaner than traditional mining and this should result in fewer regulatory snafus. Yet, companies like Exxon must invest heavily in the technology used to siphon lithium from brine and the costs are significant. 

One firm estimates it would cost in the neighborhood of $1.5 billion to construct 25,000 metric tons of capacity. Standard Lithium is analyzing a proposal to build the first commercial lithium extraction facility in the US. The capacity would be 6,000 metric tons per year and they’ve proposed a 30,000-ton plant near Magnolia. 

Small-town mayors like Mr. Parnell Vann of Magnolia are fervent seekers of job creators. What Exxon Mobile and others could bring is significant, especially since the 1980s oil bust and a host of mill closures had decimated the region. Yet, some feel the town isn’t ready, citing the disrepair of water and sewage systems, a shortage of new homes, and limited roads. Estimates point to a potential of 6,000 jobs and roughly 1,600 trucks by 2028. An influx of this size would expand the city considerably. 

Exxon has been diligently preparing for a gasoline-light future. They have been in conversations with EV and battery manufacturers and approximate demand for EVs and hybrids powered by fuel cells to reach over 50% of new auto sales by 2050. 

 

Exxon Mobil is drilling a test well in Columbia County AR.  Judge Dave Fields called me to say the county was widening the gravel road and would have to take some of our road frontage .  He said Exxon Mobil was paying for timber removed and the road widening.  Our land is in 28-17-22 on County road 78. the well is beyond our tract off of 78. Also there was an application to the AOGC for lithium royalty payments for the August meeting.  I have been told that discussion will be later.  They are offering a pittance.  I will attach said application 

Attachments:

Thanks for posting this as it contrast Texas v Arkansas.  Arkansas sets the mineral owners royalty at a hearing, as I read the attached document.  In Texas the mineral owner is free to negotiate all terms - bonus, term of years & royalty.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Thank you, Polly Ann Foote!

A royalty of 1.333 to 1.5 percent is ridiculous in my opinion.  The application states that the royalty should be based on the economics of the South Brine Unit and the South Brine Extension Unit yet no economic data is provided.  I  suspect that many on the Interested Party list are land/mineral owners within the boundaries of the said units.  I would like to see some of them engage professional assistance in opposing this application.  If it's not done now, the odds of making changes at a later date will be considerably more difficult.

The history of "miners", be they O&G companies or the "brine" companies now looking to set the regulations, is one that disadvantages the rights of private asset owners.  The regulators are tasked to be conservation overseers of the natural resources they regulate and they use that legal mandate to excuse the fact that they are, more often than not, a rubber stamp for the industry members they regulate to the detriment of private land/mineral owners.  Likewise elected officials are often compromised by their business lobby supporters who provide them with talking points to deflect the concerns of the public. 

As regulators in Arkansas and Texas will now be under the gun to create regulations that favor the industry, the time is short to organize legal opposition that will attempt a definition of fair and equitable" that many land/mineral owners would find acceptable.

I just tried to do a search for lithium prices - as expected, price is highly variable and depends on type of lithium "product'.

Any viable lease should be referencing the price metric for lithium specific to the process being used to extract the mineral (e.g., lithium carbonate). 

And tying lithium royalties to the economics of the process is a joke. O&G companies would LOVE to have this clause in their agreements. 

Lacking an economic royalty clause, O&G companies play the hedge game.  Luckily mineral lessors are shielded from that uncertainty but it is worth noting that O&G companies are no better at predicting future prices than the average lessor.  Too many factors that can not be anticipated.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service