4 Executives Share Their Gas Outlook.
March 19th, 2009 lhaines Posted in Uncategorized |
Crude oil prices have surpassed $50 a barrel for the first time in months! OPEC held its production quotas firm at its March 15 meeting and compliance with those cuts is fairly decent this time around. And just yesterday, I saw the first Wall Street report where the analyst actually increased his average oil-price estimate for 2009, to $52 a barrel from $50.

Meanwhile, natural gas prices continue to soften, well below $4 most days. But we see the elements of recovery on the horizon–lower drilling rig counts for gas, falling production in most basins. Now we have to hope that while LNG shipments to the U.S. are increasing over 2008 levels, they won’t increase too much and spoil market dynamics.

Drilling in shales continues to prove your best bet. Even smaller companies that are challenged in many ways, intend to keep drilling in them if they can. GMX Resources Inc., under fire from Centennial Partners, said on March 9 that it has reduced its 2009 capex by $70 million to $150 million–yet it still expects to drill 14 net Haynesville/Bossier horizontal wells. And why not? Even though gas prices are below $5 per Mcf, these wells create a rate of return of 25%, president and CEO Ken Kenworthy says.

What do the bigger companies say? Top executives from EOG Resources, Range Resources, Southwestern Energy and XTO Energy shared their views a week ago at the annual Simmons & Co. International energy conference in Las Vegas.

A Simmons report says the panelists hesitated to forecast gas prices for the near term, but all agreed they will range between $6 and $10 per Mcfe in 2010, as production trails off in response to lower rig counts. In this case, the decline curve is your friend.

The commodity will fluctuate around the marginal cost of production.

XTO chairman Bob Simpson looks for $7 to $10 long term. He said the company now estimates U.S. gas production will fall 10% to 12% year-over-year by December 2009–and this will outstrip demand destruction. XTO thinks the Haynesville and the Woodford shales will yield 25% IRRs at $4 per Mcf, assuming tax deferments.

Range Resources CEO John Pinkerton said the longer term looks like $7 to $8. The company estimates that if the U.S. runs 900 gas-directed rigs throughout 2009, production will be down 8% to 9% by December. He also warned that without IDC tax deductions (intangible drilling costs), less capital will go into the ground, delaying any production ramp-up. In the southeast area of the Marcellus, where Range is the major player, it can achieve a 20% IRR at $3.25 gas, due to the rich BTU content and favorable royalties.

EOG’s Loren Leiker, SVP of exploration, agrees with the range of $7 to $8. But he said EOG needs $5 in its core Barnett shale acreage and $6 in the non-core.

Finally, Harold Korell, CEO of Southwestern, says he will ramp back up in the Fayetteville “when they have the people in place and the returns justify it.” Current returns don’t justify increasing activity–but even so SWN will grow its production 70% this year. It needs $5 gas to meet its own internal hurdle rate of spending $1 to get back $1.30–but wells still show a positive present value at $4 per Mcf.

–Leslie Haines, Editor in chief, lhaines@hartenergy.com

Views: 37

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

If such economics prove to be the case, then my guess is that most of these players will continue to drill. It will be a death spiral for the weaker of these companies if they don't "drill through the slump"....that is predicated on success, not mediocrity. Hopefully, drilling costs and pipe/services will fall back in line with pre-2007 price runup levels, and the economics could improve even more....unsure whether cost reductions are already in their models, though.

My fear is the LNG ramp-up. If delivery costs are under $2.50/mcf as advertised, only a global turnaround will prevent the flood. LNG increases were predicted back in early 2000's as being significant by 2006, and if not for the pre-Olympic economic boom in China, LNG would've hit here much sooner. Interesting to see if Europe and Asia ramp up soon. Supposedly, China ha signed a huge deal for a new oil pipeline that traverses from Russia to Shanghai (west-to-eastern shores of China) to supply itself with oil for the future. They could very well have the same appetite for NG going forward.
Excellent post Parker. Did you see my link to Credit Suisse March 13 report and link to interview with Michael Hall of Stifel Nicolaus? Actually, once there is clear sign of production decline, the out month futures and strips prices will begin to react.
w.r. frank,

I consider you one of my E.F. Huttons. I read everything you post.
When W.R. Frank speaks, Parker listens!
I have a long list of E.F. Huttons. I respect them all.

I've said it before and will say it now, Cathaus is the FUNNIEST ONE I LISTEN TO.

RSS

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups



© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service