Chesapeake’s McClendon To XTO’s Simpson: “Don’t Dog The Haynesville”
August 4th, 2008 stoon Posted in Uncategorized |
XTO’s CEO Bob Simpson started it, you could say, with his thinly veiled comments during XTO’s quarterly report conference call. “That’s ridiculous,” he said, referring to estimates by an unnamed company predicting 250 trillion cubic feet of gas in place for the Haynesville shale. Said Simpson: “Nobody in their right mind has the foggiest idea” so much gas in place exists. For reference, that compares with 50 Tcf estimated for the Barnett shale.
That unnamed person, of course, is Chesapeake Energy’s CEO Aubrey McClendon, who has confidently touted the big number in the hot new shale play, in which Chesapeake has the commanding lead.
Simpson continued to say “hype artists in the shale plays” are creating a tailspin in natural gas prices. “You have to be careful following some of these people. It’s dangerous. Our credibility is on the line with that kind of hype.”
McClendon took it personally. In his conference call Friday, he fired back:
“As to recently expressed doubts about our calculations for Haynesville gas in place, if you had studied the 100 existing Haynesville logs and taken Haynesville shale cores from your first four vertical Haynesville wells and had been able to evaluate them in your own proprietary shale laboratory, then maybe you would have been able to do the same math for gas in place and recoverable gas that we have.
“Our experience and analysis tells us that on average every square mile of core and Tier 1 Haynesville shale has an average of 180 billion cubic feet of gas in place. From that gas in place we are estimating that we will recover about 52 Bcf per square mile to the drilling of eight wells per square mile. This would result in per well average recoveries of about 29% of gas in place which is consistent with expected Barnett recoveries although Barnett drilling is 50% more dense than planned Haynesville drilling.
“With about 3 million acres in (core area identified by Chesapeake), that’s about 4,700 square miles. At 52 Bcf of recoverable gas per square mile, that equals about 245 Tcf of recoverable gas in the Haynesville, exactly consistent with what we have predicted from the beginning. So instead of this number being hype, it is an entirely reasonable number based on thorough scientific examination reinforced by actual drilling results to date. Those who have followed Cheseapeake know how conservatively we have historically been in estimating the initial potiential of the Barnett, Fayetteville, Woodford and Marcellus shale plays. Our approach with the Haynesville has not changed.”
McClendon highlighted one of its last two out of 11 wells drilled in the play as producing 14 million cubic feet per day after one week of production, completed with eight stages on a 24/64th choke. He said out of 2,000 wells Chesapeake has drilled into shales, “this is the best shale well we have ever drilled. We know of no other well in any other shale play that has averaged more than 9 million cubic feet per day over the first several weeks.”
Negative comments about the Haynesville last week “had some people express concerns to us,” he said. “When you consider who all is involved in that play and the well results to date, its not very smart to start dogging that play because the well results to date are so exceptional and are only going to get better over time.”
So there. That’s some good smack coming from some heavy hitters. Maybe Simpson will keep it fun and announce another billion dollar deal to add to its YTD total of some $10+ billion—maybe this time in the Haynesville.
XTO’s CEO Bob Simpson started it, you could say, with his thinly veiled comments during XTO’s quarterly report conference call. “That’s ridiculous,” he said, referring to estimates by an unnamed company predicting 250 trillion cubic feet of gas in place for the Haynesville shale. Said Simpson: “Nobody in their right mind has the foggiest idea” so much gas in place exists. For reference, that compares with 50 Tcf estimated for the Barnett shale.
That unnamed person, of course, is Chesapeake Energy’s CEO Aubrey McClendon, who has confidently touted the big number in the hot new shale play, in which Chesapeake has the commanding lead.
Simpson continued to say “hype artists in the shale plays” are creating a tailspin in natural gas prices. “You have to be careful following some of these people. It’s dangerous. Our credibility is on the line with that kind of hype.”
McClendon took it personally. In his conference call Friday, he fired back:
“As to recently expressed doubts about our calculations for Haynesville gas in place, if you had studied the 100 existing Haynesville logs and taken Haynesville shale cores from your first four vertical Haynesville wells and had been able to evaluate them in your own proprietary shale laboratory, then maybe you would have been able to do the same math for gas in place and recoverable gas that we have.
“Our experience and analysis tells us that on average every square mile of core and Tier 1 Haynesville shale has an average of 180 billion cubic feet of gas in place. From that gas in place we are estimating that we will recover about 52 Bcf per square mile to the drilling of eight wells per square mile. This would result in per well average recoveries of about 29% of gas in place which is consistent with expected Barnett recoveries although Barnett drilling is 50% more dense than planned Haynesville drilling.
“With about 3 million acres in (core area identified by Chesapeake), that’s about 4,700 square miles. At 52 Bcf of recoverable gas per square mile, that equals about 245 Tcf of recoverable gas in the Haynesville, exactly consistent with what we have predicted from the beginning. So instead of this number being hype, it is an entirely reasonable number based on thorough scientific examination reinforced by actual drilling results to date. Those who have followed Cheseapeake know how conservatively we have historically been in estimating the initial potiential of the Barnett, Fayetteville, Woodford and Marcellus shale plays. Our approach with the Haynesville has not changed.”
McClendon highlighted one of its last two out of 11 wells drilled in the play as producing 14 million cubic feet per day after one week of production, completed with eight stages on a 24/64th choke. He said out of 2,000 wells Chesapeake has drilled into shales, “this is the best shale well we have ever drilled. We know of no other well in any other shale play that has averaged more than 9 million cubic feet per day over the first several weeks.”
Negative comments about the Haynesville last week “had some people express concerns to us,” he said. “When you consider who all is involved in that play and the well results to date, its not very smart to start dogging that play because the well results to date are so exceptional and are only going to get better over time.”
So there. That’s some good smack coming from some heavy hitters. Maybe Simpson will keep it fun and announce another billion dollar deal to add to its YTD total of some $10+ billion—maybe this time in the Haynesville.
Views: 79
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Cal (17-18)N 7W on
-
AT $7.50 per MCF how much gross revenue is this per Section? Sounds very large !!!
-
Permalink Reply by Brenton Spence on
-
52 bcf multiplied by $7.50/mcf = $390 million per section per my math....would need to be discounted for net present value (NPV).
-
-
the landowner royalties are absolutely tremendous then ...... I hope my family sees some of that, but worried that central Bienville Parish is going to be left out
-
Permalink Reply by J.R. Ewing on
-
If my calculations are right thats 609,375.00 per acre (at 7.50/mcf)on a 640 acre section at 20% royalties thats 121,875.00 for the land owner,over the life of the well,right?WOW!
-
Permalink Reply by DrWAVeSport Cd1 on
-
I listened to this one-hour-plus conference call to the analysts...Mostly boring to me.
If the analysts had not brought up the subject of the Haynesville Shale...I doubt XTO Chief would have even commented on same. And to think that XTO has its feet in so many places around the country per "shale"...I don't believe they know which foot to move or where????? So WHY did XTO buy Hunt Petroleum????????
DrWAVeSport Cd1 8/5/08
-
Permalink Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker") on
-
Which well did he reference in the conference call?
-
Permalink Reply by Les Bamburg on -
DWS, Hunt also had a significant ownership postion in a very large project in Peru. Evidently XTO was also interested in gaining additional international exposure.
-
-
Xto is investing in haynesville shale play. They have landmen competing for acreage and purchased leases from anadarko in western bienville parish maybe even into south webster parish.
Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com
Top Content
Blog Posts
The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling
Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…
ContinuePosted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40
Not a member? Get our email.
Groups
-
San Augustine, TX
386 members
-
Miller County, Arkansas
27 members
-
Sabine Parish, LA
455 members
-
South Caddo Parish Group
440 members
-
Natchitoches Parish
400 members
-
Bienville Parish, LA
244 members
-
Fayetteville Shale
149 members
-
North Caddo Parish
358 members
-
Central Texas Gas
63 members
-
Cass County, TX
119 members
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
