Not complaining, but any idea why my check is so much more for this particular well this month? I went on Sonris, but I am not sure where to look. It is a significant difference, and I was just curious why.
Tags:
I suspect that the reason is related to these three new wells which were recently turned to sales in late November. Congratulations.
HA RA SUEE;ROLLERT 23-12-13 H |
001 |
||||
HA RA SUEE;PORTER23&14-12-13HC |
001-ALT |
||||
HA RA SUEE;PORTER23&14-12-13HC |
002-ALT |
||||
HA RA SUEE;PORTER23&14-12-13HC |
003-ALT |
But, why would the production $ go up for Roller?
Forget the well names. Wells are named for the surface owner of the well site. Look instead at the unit designation, HA RA SUEE. Rollert is the original unit well and the three Porter wells are alternate unit wells. In this case the first unit that the perforated lateral penetrates is Section 23 so although there are two units, SUEE is listed for the well names. A mineral lessor in Section 23 would only receive royalty on production from the linear feet of lateral in that section for the three new wells, not that in Section 14.
68 members
478 members
194 members
11 members
405 members
18 members
250 members
457 members
11 members
388 members
Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by