I have 250 acres in section 33 16n-13w home of the failed Debroeck alt 2,
which was P and Abdn back in april 2010 due to Exco leak. Upon a recent
look at this well on sonris it shows a May 2014 "filed for P and A report".
The well status went from a 7 to a 9 and it still as it always has since its
beginning shows it to be permitted. Can anyone explain any of this to me,
It would be greatly appreciated.
| 241116 | LCV RA SU115;DEBROECK 33 | 002-ALT | E183 | 3608 | 09 | 00 | 033 | 16N | 13W | 03/31/2010 | 17017348670000 |
| REPORT DATE | WELL STATUS | MEASURED DEPTH | TRUE VERT DEPTH | DETAIL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/13/2014 | 09 | FILED P&A REPORT 5/23/14 | ||
| 04/22/2010 | 07 | PUMP FIRST PLUG FOR P&A | ||
| 04/17/2010 | 05 | SPUD 4-17-10; ENCOUNTER WELL CONTROL PROBLEMS | ||
| 03/31/2010 | 01 | 17500 | 808' FSL & 1589' FWL OF SEC 33. PBHL: 250' FNL & 1650' FWL OF SEC 33. |
PERFORATIONS
Tags:
After the well is plugged the operator sends a report to the state providing the details of how the well was plugged. The report typically shows the depth at which plugs were set, how much cement was pumped, how deep below the ground the casing was severed, etc.
what does 9 represent?
Present well status, here's the definition of status "09" (may need correction):
http://sonlite.dnr.state.la.us/sundown/cart_prod/cart_con_wellstatc...
Once the well is plugged & abandoned the code is of no consequence.
might this be a step toward well completion by Exco or am I just being naïve?
No....and yes. P&A as in plugged & abandoned.
459 members
240 members
257 members
442 members
302 members
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
GoHaynesvilleShale.com is where mineral owners, landowners and oil & gas professionals discuss the Haynesville Shale, Austin Chalk, Terryville Complex, Tuscaloosa Shale, Lower Smackover Brown Dense and lithium plays. Ask questions, share what you know, and keep up with activity in your parish or county. [ Read More ]