sesport's Discussions (2,332)

View

Discussions Replied To (2165)	Replies	Latest Activity
"Buck!!!!!!!!!!! I hereby increase your monetary value to $1 million bucks! Obviously…" sesport replied Jun 4, 2009 to Louisiana stepping up to the plate!	3	Jun 4, 2009 Reply by Jaybird
Oil & Gas Pro "Thanks for reminding me to go look at the Weekly, too, Les. best - :0)" sesport replied Jun 4, 2009 to US Natural Gas Production Curves - EIA (6/4/09)	1	Jun 4, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "If this is the Petition Project being referenced, which I haven't been able to fully…" sesport replied Jun 4, 2009 to 31,000 scientists reject 'global warming' agenda	160	Jun 11, 2009 Reply by Kat Bloomfield
landowner "Mr. Krow - Oh, we have freeways, but I'm usually too busy watching traffic to make d…" sesport replied Jun 4, 2009 to As One Economic Door Closes Could the Door of Economic Opportunity be Opening?	11	Jun 4, 2009 Reply by sesport
Oil & Gas Pro "Thanks for letting me keep the momento, I was going to wear it to the beach. What!!!…" sesport replied Jun 4, 2009 to KINDER: CO2 POLICY NEEDS NATGAS, NUCLEAR FOCUS - REUTERS ARTICLE, TUES. JUNE 2	26	Jun 4, 2009 Reply by Checkmateking
"buck - We can always count on you to find good information. My favorite tidbit from…" sesport replied Jun 4, 2009 to Pickens comes thru with the big one	2	Jun 4, 2009 Reply by sesport
Oil & Gas Pro "PG - Re. Cap & Trade fraud ... go back to page 1 of this discussion, see third p…" sesport replied Jun 4, 2009 to KINDER: CO2 POLICY NEEDS NATGAS, NUCLEAR FOCUS - REUTERS ARTICLE, TUES. JUNE 2	26	Jun 4, 2009 Reply by Checkmateking
Oil & Gas Pro "Thanks, Skip - I believe in equitable treatment of all the groups, lol Just a side n…" sesport replied Jun 4, 2009 to KINDER: CO2 POLICY NEEDS NATGAS, NUCLEAR FOCUS - REUTERS ARTICLE, TUES. JUNE 2	26	Jun 4, 2009 Reply by Checkmateking
landowner "Doing my Meg Ryan here ... difficult to argue with those numbers! That study came al…" sesport replied Jun 4, 2009 to House Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources: Oversight Hearing on "Unconventional Fuels, Part I: Shale Gas Potential"	22	Jun 4, 2009 Reply by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher)
Oil & Gas Pro "PG - I agree with all of the reasons you state! However, if the gov't. wants to pitc…" sesport replied Jun 4, 2009 to KINDER: CO2 POLICY NEEDS NATGAS, NUCLEAR FOCUS - REUTERS ARTICLE, TUES. JUNE 2	26	Jun 4, 2009 Reply by Checkmateking

‹ Previous
1
…
119
120
121
122
123
…
217
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.