Gary's Discussions (25)

View

Discussions Replied To (24)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "Section 36-11N-15W. Leased to CHK under older lease but no expenses to be withheld,…" Gary replied Oct 9, 2010 to What Price Are You Getting for Gas? Last Update: March 25, 2011	497	Dec 7, 2011 Reply by Linda Whatley
landowner "Henry: I would like to participate in your discussion, but must be too stupid to fin…" Gary replied Oct 9, 2010 to Dispute with Chesapeak on acerage in Division Order	78	Aug 25, 2011 Reply by Gary
landowner "Linda: CHK acknowledged their mistake a few months back and agreed to make it right…" Gary replied Oct 4, 2010 to Dispute with Chesapeak on acerage in Division Order	78	Aug 25, 2011 Reply by Gary
landowner "Doc: This issue was resolved a few months back. CHK acknowledged their error and ag…" Gary replied Oct 4, 2010 to Dispute with Chesapeak on acerage in Division Order	78	Aug 25, 2011 Reply by Gary
landowner "T11N R15W" Gary replied May 27, 2010 to Dispute with Chesapeak on acerage in Division Order	78	Aug 25, 2011 Reply by Gary
landowner "FYI: The_Baron discovered that our property in the W/2 of the SE/4 is actually 80.16…" Gary replied May 22, 2010 to Dispute with Chesapeak on acerage in Division Order	78	Aug 25, 2011 Reply by Gary
landowner "ALL: The_Baron is THE MAN!!! He found error made by CHP. I now have info that sho…" Gary replied May 20, 2010 to Dispute with Chesapeak on acerage in Division Order	78	Aug 25, 2011 Reply by Gary
landowner "I'm a bit green on the which legal document trumps which. Seems you are stating that…" Gary replied May 19, 2010 to Dispute with Chesapeak on acerage in Division Order	78	Aug 25, 2011 Reply by Gary
landowner "P.G. This is my thinking as well. I want to insure I am correct (on the percentage o…" Gary replied May 19, 2010 to Dispute with Chesapeak on acerage in Division Order	78	Aug 25, 2011 Reply by Gary
landowner "Skip: CHP claims the size of the Section exceeds 640 acreas, as they state the Unit…" Gary replied May 19, 2010 to Dispute with Chesapeak on acerage in Division Order	78	Aug 25, 2011 Reply by Gary

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.