landowner

Henry's Discussions (1,535)

Search Forum

View

Discussions Replied To (1130) Replies Latest Activity

Oil & Gas Pro

"Ben, To follow up on adubu's questions...  Where exactly is the "well head?"  I've a…"

Henry replied Sep 10, 2012 to Chesapeake squeezes landowners on costs amid cash crunch

 31 Sep 11, 2012
Reply by adubu

landowner

"Alas, I have not been collecting price data lately.  I think a couple of posts from…"

Henry replied Sep 7, 2012 to Chesapeake is robbing us...where are our local politicians?

 17 Sep 10, 2012
Reply by Roy Austin Smith

landowner

"Kent, I have no idea how far from one's home is a good distance.  I granted a ROW on…"

Henry replied Sep 1, 2012 to STERLING III WHATS BEING PAID PER ROD IN OKLAHOMA

 8 Sep 4, 2012
Reply by KIM CASWELL

landowner

"Kent, there are other threads on this site that you should read regarding pipeline R…"

Henry replied Sep 1, 2012 to STERLING III WHATS BEING PAID PER ROD IN OKLAHOMA

 8 Sep 4, 2012
Reply by KIM CASWELL

Oil & Gas Pro

"Skip, You are absolutely right -- Judges make mineral law. But I believe Judge Hicks…"

Henry replied Aug 31, 2012 to Chesapeake squeezes landowners on costs amid cash crunch

 31 Sep 11, 2012
Reply by adubu

landowner

"Ken, Go to this map, and zoom in on NW Louisiana, and you'll see all the Townships.…"

Henry replied Aug 23, 2012 to Section Acerage Location

 2 Aug 23, 2012
Reply by Henry

Oil & Gas Pro

""...someone needs to organize a protest..." Why don't you lead it?"

Henry replied Aug 20, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)

 85 Dec 19, 2012
Reply by Jo Ann Carter

landowner

"I agree with GoshDarn.  Try Ben Elmore."

Henry replied Aug 13, 2012 to Leasing Language Help

 25 Aug 16, 2012
Reply by Joe Aldridge

Oil & Gas Pro

"Who were the attorneys for Magnolia Point Minerals in this case?  Does anyone know?"

Henry replied Aug 10, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)

 85 Dec 19, 2012
Reply by Jo Ann Carter

Oil & Gas Pro

"Andrew, For those of us who are not familiar with this ruling, could you please uplo…"

Henry replied Aug 10, 2012 to MAGNOLIA POINT MINERALS VS CHK LA AND PXP LA - CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00854 (Decision On No Cost Royalty Language)

 85 Dec 19, 2012
Reply by Jo Ann Carter

RSS

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content 

1 Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map

Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2 More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs

More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3 Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5

Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4 Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs

Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
5 Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high

Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
6 Request For Assistance

Request For Assistance
7 The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

The Curious Case of SAMSON CONTOUR

Groups

© 2026   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service