Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
Oil & Gas Pro "I go the "Groups" page quite a lot and sort by latest activity. This helps me identi…" Les Bamburg replied Apr 15, 2009 to Does anybody want to divide up the site between Shale and everything else?	132	Apr 18, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "Taylor, your welcome & de nada!" Les Bamburg replied Apr 15, 2009 to Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer by the US Dept of Energy (DOE)	7	Apr 21, 2009 Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker")
landowner "Jim, I was looking for a Hall Summit industrial park." Les Bamburg replied Apr 14, 2009 to 5 Reasons Natural Gas Is Poised to Bounce Back	13	Apr 15, 2009 Reply by Kat Bloomfield
landowner "Lanadan, you are correct that both the Iroquois and Maritimes Pipelines currently de…" Les Bamburg replied Apr 13, 2009 to Natural Gas from Russia	9	Apr 14, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "Parker, just a slight clarification. You don't actually switch the coal plant to nat…" Les Bamburg replied Apr 13, 2009 to 5 Reasons Natural Gas Is Poised to Bounce Back	13	Apr 15, 2009 Reply by Kat Bloomfield
landowner "KB, this was the approach utilized by Indonesia in the 1980's. They encouraged the c…" Les Bamburg replied Apr 13, 2009 to 5 Reasons Natural Gas Is Poised to Bounce Back	13	Apr 15, 2009 Reply by Kat Bloomfield
landowner "Jim, personally I consider the Eagle Ford Shale more of a South Texas play and as su…" Les Bamburg replied Apr 13, 2009 to Natural Gas from Russia	9	Apr 14, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "JHH, the story is slightly misleading as the part of the deal involving North Americ…" Les Bamburg replied Apr 13, 2009 to Natural Gas from Russia	9	Apr 14, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "JHH, Chesapeake has already estimated the Haynesville Shale contains a minimum ultim…" Les Bamburg replied Apr 13, 2009 to 150 Trillion...!	2	Apr 13, 2009 Reply by JHH
landowner "Ken, if you believe Chesapeake's 3.5 MM acres there would be ~ 0.5 MM acres unleased." Les Bamburg replied Apr 13, 2009 to Haynesville Shale Net Acreage Position	8	Apr 15, 2009 Reply by Kat Bloomfield

‹ Previous
1
…
298
299
300
301
302
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.