LP's Discussions (442)

View

Discussions Replied To (361)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "Thanks Insomniacnla. Waiting with anxious anticipation for their response. I truly h…" LP replied Jan 26, 2009 to Exxon buying Chesapeake	35	Feb 1, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "Exxon is semi-US. Much of it is owned by Saudi Arabia and various oil Sheiks. Exxon…" LP replied Jan 26, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "I would much prefer to have Chesapeake keep Chesapeake and prosper....producing USA…" LP replied Jan 26, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "I would have some concern with O & G companies that have their primary interest…" LP replied Jan 26, 2009 to Would Exxon or BP be better or worse than Chesapeake for our area?	40	Jan 27, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Insomniacnla, Did they confirm the report ? I dare say they would have a lot of inte…" LP replied Jan 26, 2009 to Exxon buying Chesapeake	35	Feb 1, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "Paul, Type this into Google and you will find the story from several different finan…" LP replied Jan 26, 2009 to Exxon buying Chesapeake	35	Feb 1, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "I know that rumors have been floating around for some time. When the local TV statio…" LP replied Jan 26, 2009 to Exxon buying Chesapeake	35	Feb 1, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "Reuter's is reporting that BP is the one making a bid for Chesapeake. BP jumps; tra…" LP replied Jan 26, 2009 to Exxon buying Chesapeake	35	Feb 1, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "Yes. That was the report. And that they are opening an office in Shreveport. I sent…" LP replied Jan 26, 2009 to Exxon buying Chesapeake	35	Feb 1, 2009 Reply by sesport
landowner "I heard that on KTAL and immediately began looking for news about it but so far, I h…" LP replied Jan 26, 2009 to Exxon buying Chesapeake	35	Feb 1, 2009 Reply by sesport

‹ Previous
1
…
31
32
33
34
35
…
37
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.