Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "Baron, an estimate of cost is essentially an AFE - really no difference. Any costs i…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 24, 2008 to Unleased, forced in to pool for producing well, what now?	84	Dec 4, 2008 Reply by Grillin' - MmmMmm
landowner "Baron, all costs are "billed" to WIO's whether they are capital or operating costs.…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 24, 2008 to Unleased, forced in to pool for producing well, what now?	84	Dec 4, 2008 Reply by Grillin' - MmmMmm
landowner "Baron, my opinion is an unleased mineral owner (carried working interest owner) has…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 24, 2008 to Unleased, forced in to pool for producing well, what now?	84	Dec 4, 2008 Reply by Grillin' - MmmMmm
"KB, the reserves were always there but just carried in the probable or possible cate…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 24, 2008 to LANDMAN JUST STOPPED BY ABOUT 30 MINUTES AGO (CADDO 19-15-36)	188	Dec 6, 2008 Reply by Iris
landowner "Baron, my opinion is an unleased mineral owner (carried working interest owner) has…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 24, 2008 to Question about Unitization	29	Nov 25, 2008 Reply by Snake Stewart
landowner "Sesport, in California a lot of "biogas" projects are being developed since it is a…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 24, 2008 to Stackin em Deep! Sellin em Cheap?	45	Nov 28, 2008 Reply by Grillin' - MmmMmm
"LL, I would say all operators are not created equal. I have heard positive feedback…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 21, 2008 to Samson Pre-App Hearing 11-19	83	Nov 21, 2008 Reply by The_Baron
"Grice, the concern involves a single section unit (640 acres). The operator drills a…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 21, 2008 to Limitations on a Shale permit	40	Nov 21, 2008 Reply by The_Baron
"KB, pretty clothes?" Les Bamburg replied Nov 21, 2008 to Samson Pre-App Hearing 11-19	83	Nov 21, 2008 Reply by The_Baron
"LL, one approach would be for the state to require the unit operator to file a devel…" Les Bamburg replied Nov 20, 2008 to Limitations on a Shale permit	40	Nov 21, 2008 Reply by The_Baron

‹ Previous
1
…
335
336
337
338
339
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.