w.r. frank's Discussions (397)

View

Discussions Replied To (366)	Replies	Latest Activity
Oil & Gas Pro "Agree that E&P's are generally 60 to 80% hedged in 2009 and less in 2010 (other…" w.r. frank replied Apr 17, 2009 to Exco (Winchester) - HA RA SUB; Lattin 24 # 4/ Section 24, T14N-R14W 16,677 Mcf/day	22	Apr 18, 2009 Reply by Spring Branch,mineral owner
Oil & Gas Pro "Jim, WELL SAID!" w.r. frank replied Apr 16, 2009 to Does anybody want to divide up the site between Shale and everything else?	132	Apr 18, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "YES!!!" w.r. frank replied Apr 15, 2009 to Does anybody want to divide up the site between Shale and everything else?	132	Apr 18, 2009 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "What is your point? Your original post was: "I believe he' right on. Talks facts no…" w.r. frank replied Apr 15, 2009 to Haynesville Sizzle Might Fizzle	47	Apr 22, 2009 Reply by The_Baron
Oil & Gas Pro "This guy makes no sense! Basically, with no access to logs, cores, pressures, scienc…" w.r. frank replied Apr 14, 2009 to Haynesville Sizzle Might Fizzle	47	Apr 22, 2009 Reply by The_Baron
landowner "Thanks Jim. Messenger sure drops off in production rapidly. From 96 mmcf in 22 days…" w.r. frank replied Apr 13, 2009 to Encana Well in Red River Parish Posted	25	Apr 13, 2009 Reply by w.r. frank
landowner "Jim, how can you tell Messenger is a vertical Bossier Shale instead of a vertical HA…" w.r. frank replied Apr 12, 2009 to Encana Well in Red River Parish Posted	25	Apr 13, 2009 Reply by w.r. frank
Oil & Gas Pro "The frightening information on pipeline capacity out of Perryville. If 60 rigs runni…" w.r. frank replied Apr 9, 2009 to PetroHawk Updates Estimated Ultimate Recoveries	14	Apr 9, 2009 Reply by ShaleGeo
Oil & Gas Pro "Stoneburner indicated that HK would be reporting on wells "in a couple of weeks." Si…" w.r. frank replied Apr 9, 2009 to PetroHawk Updates Estimated Ultimate Recoveries	14	Apr 9, 2009 Reply by ShaleGeo
landowner "HS is a resource play, whereas CV is a reservior/structure play." w.r. frank replied Apr 1, 2009 to Which fields have historically been the most productive? Is this an indicator of the order the fields will be developed?	8	Apr 2, 2009

‹ Previous
1
…
32
33
34
35
36
37
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.