Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
"Harold, thank you for the information. By the way what field name is EnCana using fo…" Les Bamburg replied Oct 20, 2008 to Forced Pooling in sec6 T12N R9W	21	Nov 6, 2008 Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker")
landowner "Trisha, in addition to the information KB has so graciously provided, Section 19 to…" Les Bamburg replied Oct 20, 2008 to Section 30	5	Oct 20, 2008 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Trisha, can you provide the Township and Range or at least some additional informati…" Les Bamburg replied Oct 19, 2008 to Section 30	5	Oct 20, 2008 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "Jay, I am not advocating but the unleased mineral owner is a working interest owner…" Les Bamburg replied Oct 19, 2008 to Decline Curves: Barnett vs. Haynesville	203	Jul 5, 2011 Reply by sesport II
landowner "VSC, I think the timing will be dependent upon many factors such as rig count, land…" Les Bamburg replied Oct 19, 2008 to Well Questions	16	Oct 19, 2008 Reply by RAY
Oil & Gas Pro "Parker, I believe confidential information such as core data should be available to…" Les Bamburg replied Oct 19, 2008 to Decline Curves: Barnett vs. Haynesville	203	Jul 5, 2011 Reply by sesport II
Oil & Gas Pro "Skip, an example of how higher initial flow rates can have a higher initial decline…" Les Bamburg replied Oct 19, 2008 to Decline Curves: Barnett vs. Haynesville	203	Jul 5, 2011 Reply by sesport II
Oil & Gas Pro "Grice, the testing facilities you refer to are for analyzing well cores and other ge…" Les Bamburg replied Oct 19, 2008 to Decline Curves: Barnett vs. Haynesville	203	Jul 5, 2011 Reply by sesport II
Oil & Gas Pro "Grice, the IP rate is the initial test flow rate which would be reflective of choke…" Les Bamburg replied Oct 19, 2008 to Decline Curves: Barnett vs. Haynesville	203	Jul 5, 2011 Reply by sesport II
"Harold, it looks as though EnCana is forming units in the middle of Red River Parish…" Les Bamburg replied Oct 18, 2008 to Forced Pooling in sec6 T12N R9W	21	Nov 6, 2008 Reply by Bobi Carr ("parker")

‹ Previous
1
…
341
342
343
344
345
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.