Les Bamburg's Discussions (5,266)

View

Discussions Replied To (3698)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "AL, I believe that would likely be same as the Mid-Bossier Shale formation. The lat…" Les Bamburg replied Feb 24, 2011 to Formation Depth Question?	1	Feb 24, 2011 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "ETH, I am staying away from that argument as I value my body parts too much. :-)" Les Bamburg replied Feb 24, 2011 to Smackover-Something Is Going On	15	Feb 25, 2011 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
"KCM, natural gas prices climbed based on their own supply-demand. Realize the US ha…" Les Bamburg replied Feb 24, 2011 to Will rising oil prices drag gas prices up too	43	Mar 25, 2011 Reply by Wilma Watts
"JHH, the Utica Shale could be oil which would potentially give better economics than…" Les Bamburg replied Feb 24, 2011 to Chesapeake plans to lease over a million acres of utica shale in ohio	9	Mar 31, 2011 Reply by Scott j
landowner "Terry, in the area of interest near the Arkanasa/Louisiana state line the Smackover…" Les Bamburg replied Feb 24, 2011 to Smackover-Something Is Going On	15	Feb 25, 2011 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
Oil & Gas Pro "BR, see the attached examples. Conventional represents a well initially produced on…" Les Bamburg replied Feb 24, 2011 to Type Curves	12	Mar 3, 2011 Reply by Sarah
landowner "NL, I believe the cost would be quite a few grand. Typically these reports are prov…" Les Bamburg replied Feb 23, 2011 to Who is Ross Smith Energy Group?	5	Feb 24, 2011 Reply by North LA
landowner "NL, they are an energy consulting firm that provides information at a price." Les Bamburg replied Feb 22, 2011 to Who is Ross Smith Energy Group?	5	Feb 24, 2011 Reply by North LA
landowner "Skip, if Chesapeake is marketing the production then they may be the ones setting th…" Les Bamburg replied Feb 22, 2011 to Sec 23 - T9-N, R13-W	6	Feb 22, 2011 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Donna/Ty, it means you will need to look to Comstock for royalty payments. It is po…" Les Bamburg replied Feb 22, 2011 to Sec 23 - T9-N, R13-W	6	Feb 22, 2011 Reply by Les Bamburg

‹ Previous
1
…
59
60
61
62
63
…
370
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.