L. Brent Moseley's Discussions (18)

View

Discussions Replied To (17)	Replies	Latest Activity
"My apologies. It is just that I see a lot of greed expressed on this site instead of…" L. Brent Moseley replied Aug 23, 2010 to Small Chokes for Initial Production?	14	Aug 24, 2010 Reply by Les Bamburg
"Quit whinning and be grateful that you have one of the best operators in the area th…" L. Brent Moseley replied Aug 22, 2010 to Small Chokes for Initial Production?	14	Aug 24, 2010 Reply by Les Bamburg
"Les, thought you might be interested in the production figures from the first well o…" L. Brent Moseley replied Apr 7, 2010 to Maybe Bigger is Not Always Better--Recent PetroHawk Announcement	38	Jan 19, 2011 Reply by smith1
"Today's Bloomberg article is not a lot to cheer about - looks like most experts see…" L. Brent Moseley replied Nov 30, 2009 to December Nat Gas trating @ $5.10, up 34 cents	11	Dec 1, 2009 Reply by Scott
"One of the four wells is the Petrohawk Dehan 23944 well mentioned in the Mainland Re…" L. Brent Moseley replied Nov 14, 2009 to Maybe Bigger is Not Always Better--Recent PetroHawk Announcement	38	Jan 19, 2011 Reply by smith1
"Wow, thanks, Les. If you hear of results from the choke experimentation, I am sure w…" L. Brent Moseley replied Oct 13, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley
"Les, did you see my last two posts about the Midland press release? I would be inter…" L. Brent Moseley replied Oct 10, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley
"Les, in the Mainland Resources, there is this statement: " The Operator has been per…" L. Brent Moseley replied Oct 2, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley
"Les, based on this press release by Mainland Resources that has a 22% stake in the w…" L. Brent Moseley replied Sep 24, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley
"Les, I have heard from an industry insider that this well, which has been in product…" L. Brent Moseley replied Sep 12, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley

‹ Previous
1
2
Next ›

RSS

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

Support GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Blog Posts

The Lithium Connection to Shale Drilling

Shale drilling and lithium extraction are seemingly distinct activities, but there is a growing connection between the two as the world moves towards cleaner energy solutions. While shale drilling primarily targets…

Continue

Posted by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher) on November 20, 2024 at 12:40

Not a member? Get our email.

Groups

San Augustine, TX

386 members
Miller County, Arkansas

27 members

Sabine Parish, LA

455 members
South Caddo Parish Group

440 members

Natchitoches Parish

400 members
Bienville Parish, LA

244 members

Fayetteville Shale

149 members
North Caddo Parish

358 members

Central Texas Gas

63 members
Cass County, TX

119 members

View All

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

h2	h2	h2
About As exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More	Links About General Info Guidelines Supporters Donate Advertise Subscriptions Contact us

About

As exciting as this is, we know that we have a responsibility to do this thing correctly. After all, we want the farm to remain a place where the family can gather for another 80 years and beyond. This site was born out of these desires. Before we started this site, googling "shale' brought up little information. Certainly nothing that was useful as we negotiated a lease. Read More

Links

Badges │ Report an Issue │ Terms of Service

1	Looking Back At The Haynesville Shale - A Retrospective
2	Pending Public Oil and Gas Hearings
3	Arkansas Smackover Lithium Play
4	Comstock October Presentation
5	Aethon looks for Buyers of its Haynesville Assets
6	Notice Emails Are Back! Please review how they work.
7	Arkansas O&G Commission unanimously denies royalty rate application for lithium extraction

L. Brent Moseley's Discussions (18)

"My apologies. It is just that I see a lot of greed expressed on this site instead of…"

"Quit whinning and be grateful that you have one of the best operators in the area th…"

"Les, thought you might be interested in the production figures from the first well o…"

"Today's Bloomberg article is not a lot to cheer about - looks like most experts see…"

"One of the four wells is the Petrohawk Dehan 23944 well mentioned in the Mainland Re…"

"Wow, thanks, Les. If you hear of results from the choke experimentation, I am sure w…"

"Les, did you see my last two posts about the Midland press release? I would be inter…"

"Les, in the Mainland Resources, there is this statement: " The Operator has been per…"

"Les, based on this press release by Mainland Resources that has a 22% stake in the w…"

"Les, I have heard from an industry insider that this well, which has been in product…"