L. Brent Moseley's Discussions (18)

View

Discussions Replied To (17)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "My apologies. It is just that I see a lot of greed expressed on this site instead of…" L. Brent Moseley replied Aug 23, 2010 to Small Chokes for Initial Production?	14	Aug 24, 2010 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Quit whinning and be grateful that you have one of the best operators in the area th…" L. Brent Moseley replied Aug 22, 2010 to Small Chokes for Initial Production?	14	Aug 24, 2010 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "Les, thought you might be interested in the production figures from the first well o…" L. Brent Moseley replied Apr 7, 2010 to Maybe Bigger is Not Always Better--Recent PetroHawk Announcement	38	Jan 19, 2011 Reply by smith1
landowner "Today's Bloomberg article is not a lot to cheer about - looks like most experts see…" L. Brent Moseley replied Nov 30, 2009 to December Nat Gas trating @ $5.10, up 34 cents	11	Dec 1, 2009 Reply by Scott
Oil & Gas Pro "One of the four wells is the Petrohawk Dehan 23944 well mentioned in the Mainland Re…" L. Brent Moseley replied Nov 14, 2009 to Maybe Bigger is Not Always Better--Recent PetroHawk Announcement	38	Jan 19, 2011 Reply by smith1
landowner "Wow, thanks, Les. If you hear of results from the choke experimentation, I am sure w…" L. Brent Moseley replied Oct 13, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley
landowner "Les, did you see my last two posts about the Midland press release? I would be inter…" L. Brent Moseley replied Oct 10, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley
landowner "Les, in the Mainland Resources, there is this statement: " The Operator has been per…" L. Brent Moseley replied Oct 2, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley
landowner "Les, based on this press release by Mainland Resources that has a 22% stake in the w…" L. Brent Moseley replied Sep 24, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley
landowner "Les, I have heard from an industry insider that this well, which has been in product…" L. Brent Moseley replied Sep 12, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley

‹ Previous
1
2
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Rockcliff III Counters Haynesville Inventory Concerns with Shelby Trough Push
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.