L. Brent Moseley's Discussions (18)

View

Discussions Replied To (17)	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "My apologies. It is just that I see a lot of greed expressed on this site instead of…" L. Brent Moseley replied Aug 23, 2010 to Small Chokes for Initial Production?	14	Aug 24, 2010 Reply by Les Bamburg
landowner "Quit whinning and be grateful that you have one of the best operators in the area th…" L. Brent Moseley replied Aug 22, 2010 to Small Chokes for Initial Production?	14	Aug 24, 2010 Reply by Les Bamburg
Oil & Gas Pro "Les, thought you might be interested in the production figures from the first well o…" L. Brent Moseley replied Apr 7, 2010 to Maybe Bigger is Not Always Better--Recent PetroHawk Announcement	38	Jan 19, 2011 Reply by smith1
landowner "Today's Bloomberg article is not a lot to cheer about - looks like most experts see…" L. Brent Moseley replied Nov 30, 2009 to December Nat Gas trating @ $5.10, up 34 cents	11	Dec 1, 2009 Reply by Scott
Oil & Gas Pro "One of the four wells is the Petrohawk Dehan 23944 well mentioned in the Mainland Re…" L. Brent Moseley replied Nov 14, 2009 to Maybe Bigger is Not Always Better--Recent PetroHawk Announcement	38	Jan 19, 2011 Reply by smith1
landowner "Wow, thanks, Les. If you hear of results from the choke experimentation, I am sure w…" L. Brent Moseley replied Oct 13, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley
landowner "Les, did you see my last two posts about the Midland press release? I would be inter…" L. Brent Moseley replied Oct 10, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley
landowner "Les, in the Mainland Resources, there is this statement: " The Operator has been per…" L. Brent Moseley replied Oct 2, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley
landowner "Les, based on this press release by Mainland Resources that has a 22% stake in the w…" L. Brent Moseley replied Sep 24, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley
landowner "Les, I have heard from an industry insider that this well, which has been in product…" L. Brent Moseley replied Sep 12, 2009 to Petrohawk 239644 Section 15, T13n14w, Desoto parish	48	Oct 13, 2009 Reply by L. Brent Moseley

‹ Previous
1
2
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Visit the Forum and click "Follow" after the last discussion.

Top Content

1	DUC and Cover: Haynesville Crosses 60 Rigs as Producers Bank Wells
2	Advice Requested on Expand Royalty Deductions
3	USGS drops new numbers on natural gas found in Bossier formation. It's years worth.
4	Set alarm for me
5	Apex now leasing
6	Sabine County, Texas
7	Declining Haynesville Region & Western Haynesville Play: Shreveport Geological Society Presentation

RSS
View All

Groups

North LA Cotton Valley C…

68 members
Shelby County, TX

478 members

Nacogdoches County

194 members
SMACKOVER LITHIUM GROUP …

11 members

Natchitoches Parish

405 members
WESTERN HAYNESVILLE

18 members

Bienville Parish, LA

250 members
Sabine Parish, LA

457 members

SMACKOVER LITHIUM GROUP …

11 members
San Augustine, TX

388 members

View All

Blog Posts

landowner

Tuscaloosa Trend Sits On Top Of Poorest Neighbourhood For Decades - Yet No Royalties Ever Paid To The Community -- Why??

Posted by Char on May 29, 2025 at 14:42 — 4 Comments

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.