Search Results (699)

Discussions	Replies	Latest Activity
landowner "$25.00 is more than fair les, the majority of everyone in the Barnett Shale received…" Jerad Doty replied Jun 18, 2009 to Seismograph Work and Fee Rate	15	Jun 26, 2009 Reply by danny meyers
landowner "I agree with you Bob. Remember all the leasing going on it spring 2008 for $100-$350…" kittycatmama replied Mar 19, 2010 to Received Letter today wanting to buy only OIL interest in 14/14 Desoto	28	Mar 21, 2010 Reply by Mac Davis
landowner "I suppose the mineral owner may be able to force you into seismic testing if you don…" benny688 replied Sep 4, 2010 to Surface estate vs Mineral estate	10	Sep 6, 2010 Reply by ronda and bruce
landowner ""Panolo" County... I know, it's a typo. September 15, 2009 Devon Energy Discusses…" JHH replied Sep 15, 2009 to Where in the World?	1	Sep 15, 2009 Reply by jffree1
landowner "Nah, i'm not callin the landman back, that was supposed to be the deal from the star…" TJ replied Nov 26, 2008 to Seismographic survey	6	Nov 28, 2008 Reply by Henry, Landowner
landowner "How close is that to your house? I was told that they could not come within so many…" DaddyT replied May 29, 2009 to QUESTION ABOUT PROS AND CONS IN GIVING PERMISSION FOR SEISMIC TESTING	30	Apr 18, 2010 Reply by Explorer
landowner "They reported to the IRS in my two seismic transactions, also. CG Veritas Land, and…" RBT replied Feb 9, 2010 to Taxes on seismic survey payment	5	Feb 10, 2010 Reply by layla
"Ronny, Certainly I would think this would be a seismic anomaly. Perhaps someone in…" Aubrey C. Sanders, Jr. replied Jun 25, 2010 to "CRATERING" OF BP WELL FROM HELL	32	Jun 25, 2010 Reply by Aubrey C. Sanders, Jr.
landowner "I heard the same thing from more than one Seismic person(Various Project Managers) w…" Marc Stepman replied Jul 4, 2010 to Smackover Sand Deposit	151	Jul 12, 2010 Reply by Skip Peel - Mineral Consultant
Oil & Gas Pro "Robert, I take all these maps with a bit of caution. It is possible that Petrohawk'…" Les Bamburg replied Dec 17, 2010 to Haynesville Shale Maps (12/16/10)	31	Dec 18, 2010 Reply by Robert Duke

‹ Previous
1
…
39
40
41
42
43
…
70
Next ›

Welcome to
GoHaynesvilleShale.com

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

📧 Want email updates on new discussions?
Click Forum and scroll down past the last discussion and click the "Follow" button.

Top Content

1	Haynesville Deep Phase 1 3D Seismic map
2	More Natural Gas for the Gulf Coast Market with Low Breakeven costs
3	Standard Lithium vs GeoFrame vs T5
4	Adjustments to revenue statemens older than 3 years by BPX
5	Unleased Louisiana Mineral Owners Are on the Hook for Post-Production Costs
6	Billion dollar changes in the Haynesville Shale, energy prices expected to stay high
7	Request For Assistance

RSS
View All

Groups

Red River Parish

307 members
Natchitoches Parish

409 members

Unleased Mineral Owners

286 members
ALTERNATE ENERGY TECHNOL…

6 members

Union County, AR

49 members

View All

© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service

#xg { position:relative;top:120px; } #xn_bar { top:120px; }

Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use GoHaynesvilleShale.com.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.